capitalize-sql #20991
capitalize-sql #20991
Conversation
|
|
|
Welcome @xiaodong-png! |
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
contribution
|
Hi @xiaodong-png. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a pingcap member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
the
missing-translation-status
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @xiaodong-png, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
Hello! Gemini here, providing a summary of this pull request. This PR, authored by xiaodong-png, focuses on a minor documentation formatting adjustment. Based on the title "capitalize-sql" and the changes presented, the primary intent is to standardize the capitalization of the language identifier used in markdown code blocks for SQL examples within the documentation. The change specifically targets one file to update the identifier from lowercase sql to uppercase SQL.
Highlights
- Documentation Formatting: The main change involves updating the language identifier for SQL code blocks in a markdown file to use uppercase
SQLinstead of lowercasesqlfor consistency.
Changelog
- metrics-schema.md
- Changed the markdown code block language identifier from
sqltoSQLon line 19.
- Changed the markdown code block language identifier from
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
the
size/XS
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This PR aims to capitalize SQL language identifiers in markdown code blocks, which is a good step towards stylistic consistency. The current change updates one instance in metrics-schema.md.
Review Summary:
The primary feedback, detailed in the comment on metrics-schema.md, concerns the scope of this change. To achieve the consistency implied by the PR title ("capitalize-sql"), it's recommended that all ```sql identifiers in the file (and potentially across the documentation, if this is a broader initiative) be updated to ```SQL.
Additionally, the pull request description is currently missing some required information:
- The "What is changed, added or deleted?" section should be filled out to explain the purpose and scope of the changes.
- The "Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to?" section needs to be completed.
This information is crucial for reviewers and for tracking changes.
Style Guide Adherence:
This review adheres to the "Documentation Review Style Guide" provided. Key principles from the guide that informed this feedback include:
- Consistency: The importance of consistency (Style Guide lines 25, 47-49) was a major factor in suggesting a broader application of the capitalization change.
- Clarity and Completeness: These general principles (Style Guide line 14) apply to ensuring the PR description is fully informative.
- Review Process: The directive to prefer adding comments over requesting changes to avoid blocking PRs (Style Guide line 9) has influenced the
review_statusof this review.
Following the style guide's directive (line 9), I am setting the review status to COMMENT. However, I strongly recommend addressing the consistency issue by updating all relevant SQL language identifiers and completing the PR description before merging.
Summary of Findings
- Incomplete Capitalization of SQL Identifiers: The PR titled "capitalize-sql" updates only one instance of
```sqlto```SQLinmetrics-schema.md. For overall consistency, as suggested by the PR's intent, all such language identifiers in the file (and potentially other documentation files, if this is a broader effort) should be updated. This aligns with the style guide's emphasis on consistency (Style Guide lines 25, 47-49). - Missing PR Description Details: The pull request description currently lacks required information in the "What is changed, added or deleted?" and "Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to?" sections. Completing these sections is important for providing context to reviewers and for proper change tracking.
Merge Readiness
This PR makes a positive stylistic change by capitalizing an SQL language identifier in a markdown code block. The change itself is correct.
However, for this effort to be truly effective and align with the implied goal of consistency (a key principle from the Style Guide, lines 25, 47-49), the capitalization should be applied to all ```sql instances within metrics-schema.md. Furthermore, the PR description needs to be completed with the necessary details about the change and affected versions.
As per the project's style guide (line 9), which advises against blocking PRs unnecessarily, the review status is set to COMMENT. Nevertheless, I strongly recommend that the author address the points raised—particularly ensuring consistent capitalization of all SQL identifiers in the file and filling out the PR description—before this change is merged. Please note that I am not authorized to approve pull requests; this decision rests with other reviewers and maintainers.
metrics-schema.md
Outdated
| @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ SELECT * FROM uptime; | |||
| SELECT * FROM information_schema.metrics_tables WHERE table_name='uptime'\G | |||
| ``` | |||
|
|
|||
| ```sql | |||
| ```SQL | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for capitalizing the SQL language identifier here from sql to SQL! This is a good step towards improving stylistic consistency in the documentation.
I noticed that this change is applied to this specific code block, but there are several other instances of ```sql (lowercase) in this file that remain unchanged. For example:
- Line 13
- Line 45
- Line 49
- Line 107
- And many others throughout the document.
Given the PR title "capitalize-sql", is the intention to update all SQL language identifiers to uppercase for consistency? 1 If so, applying this change to all instances in this document (e.g., changing ```sql to ```SQL everywhere) would be highly beneficial for maintaining a uniform style and enhancing readability.
Could you clarify if this PR is intended to be a partial update or if these other instances were overlooked? If the goal is full consistency, I recommend updating all occurrences.
Style Guide References
Footnotes
-
The style guide emphasizes the use of consistent terminology (line 25) and warns against inconsistent technical terms (lines 47-49). This principle of consistency is also important for formatting choices, such as the capitalization of language identifiers in code blocks, to ensure a uniform and professional presentation of the documentation. (link) ↩
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
First-time contributors' checklist
What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)
Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
Tips for choosing the affected version(s):
By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.
For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions.
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?