-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OpenRTB 2.6-202409 + AdCom v1.0-202409 #16
Conversation
SyntaxNode
commented
Nov 20, 2024
•
edited
Loading
edited
- OpenRTB 2.6-202409
- AdCom v1.0-202409
openrtb2/eid.go
Outdated
// Description: | ||
// Match method used by the matcher. Refer to List: Delivery Methods | ||
// in AdCOM 1.0. | ||
MM int64 `json:"mm,omitempty"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Implementing as omitempty instead of a pointer following our "zero value has no meaning" convention.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
openrtb2/eid.go
Outdated
// Type: | ||
// integer | ||
// Description: | ||
// Match method used by the matcher. Refer to List: Delivery Methods |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be "Refer to List: ID Match Methods"
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. Fixed.
openrtb2/eid.go
Outdated
// Description: | ||
// Match method used by the matcher. Refer to List: Delivery Methods | ||
// in AdCOM 1.0. | ||
MM int64 `json:"mm,omitempty"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should the type be MatchMethod
instead of int64
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. Fixed.