Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OpenRTB 2.6-202409 + AdCom v1.0-202409 #16

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

SyntaxNode
Copy link
Contributor

@SyntaxNode SyntaxNode commented Nov 20, 2024

@SyntaxNode SyntaxNode changed the title OpenRTB 2.6-202409 + AdCom v1.0-2024-09 OpenRTB 2.6-202409 + AdCom v1.0-202409 Nov 20, 2024
openrtb2/eid.go Outdated
// Description:
// Match method used by the matcher. Refer to List: Delivery Methods
// in AdCOM 1.0.
MM int64 `json:"mm,omitempty"`
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Implementing as omitempty instead of a pointer following our "zero value has no meaning" convention.

Copy link

@hhhjort hhhjort left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

openrtb2/eid.go Outdated
// Type:
// integer
// Description:
// Match method used by the matcher. Refer to List: Delivery Methods
Copy link
Collaborator

@bsardo bsardo Dec 4, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be "Refer to List: ID Match Methods"?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. Fixed.

openrtb2/eid.go Outdated
// Description:
// Match method used by the matcher. Refer to List: Delivery Methods
// in AdCOM 1.0.
MM int64 `json:"mm,omitempty"`
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should the type be MatchMethod instead of int64?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. Fixed.

@SyntaxNode SyntaxNode merged commit bb6e1c5 into prebid:main Dec 12, 2024
2 checks passed
@SyntaxNode SyntaxNode deleted the ortb-202409 branch December 12, 2024 20:57
Abyfall pushed a commit to onfocusio/openrtb-adagio that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants