Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

papr: add pipeline for deploying customized Jenkins #4

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2018

Conversation

jlebon
Copy link
Collaborator

@jlebon jlebon commented Feb 8, 2018

This is the first step towards getting PAPR into an OpenShift instance.
This only sets up the infrastructure for PAPR, not PAPR itself. See
the README.md for more information and how to get started.

I'd like to have the actual job that executes the PAPR test runs be a
Jenkins Pipeline. I'd rather avoid having to create JJB YAML files if
possible.

The next step is now to modify PAPR itself to run as a pipeline and,
more importantly, to run containerized tests in pods rather than
assuming access to docker.sock.

This is the first step towards getting PAPR into an OpenShift instance.
This only sets up the *infrastructure* for PAPR, not PAPR itself. See
the `README.md` for more information and how to get started.

I'd like to have the actual job that executes the PAPR test runs be a
Jenkins Pipeline. I'd rather avoid having to create JJB YAML files if
possible.

The next step is now to modify PAPR itself to run as a pipeline and,
more importantly, to run containerized tests in pods rather than
assuming access to `docker.sock`.
@jlebon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jlebon commented Feb 8, 2018

To paraphrase projectatomic/papr#62 (comment) here: this doesn't have to be how we do things down the line. This is just the easiest path to get PAPR into there first, because it gives all of us the ability to easily reproduce and iterate locally. From there, further improvements can follow much more naturally.

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

AWESOME 😄

So I only scanned this, it looks sane.

@jlebon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jlebon commented Feb 8, 2018

Let's merge this? I already have some follow-up work already. :)

@cgwalters cgwalters merged commit b6d0db3 into projectatomic:master Feb 8, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants