Update from the upstream template #47
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Lee-W
force-pushed
the
update-from-the-upstream-template
branch
from
a1fac86 to
68af0a2
Compare
|
I currently use pylint and flake8. It seems that ruff is more powerful tool 🤩 |
Xiao75896453
approved these changes
Jun 5, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Types of changes
Description
Update from the upstream template https://github.com/Lee-W/cookiecutter-python-template
Checklist:
inv stylelocally to ensure all linter checks passinv testlocally to ensure all test cases passinv securelocally to ensure no major vulnerability is introducedSteps to Test This Pull Request
Expected behavior
no functionality change
Related Issue
Additional context