Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update release_notes.rst #1223

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 31, 2024
Merged

Update release_notes.rst #1223

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
e50b9f4
Update release_notes.rst
andercarrera Jan 31, 2024
0c947f9
use AttributeContainer in both cases
ikonst Jan 31, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/release_notes.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Breaking changes:
If your codebase uses :py:class:`~pynamodb.attributes.BinaryAttribute` or :py:class:`~pynamodb.attributes.BinarySetAttribute`,
go over the attribute declarations and mark them accordingly.
* When using binary attributes, the return value of :meth:`~pynamodb.models.Model.serialize` will no longer be JSON-serializable
since it will contain :code:`bytes` objects. Use :meth:`~pynamodb.models.Model.to_dynamodb_dict`
since it will contain :code:`bytes` objects. Use :meth:`~pynamodb.attributes.AttributeContainer.to_dynamodb_dict` and :meth:`~pynamodb.attributes.AttributeContainer.to_simple_dict` for JSON-serializable mappings.
for a safe JSON-serializable representation.

* Python 3.6 is no longer supported.
Expand Down
Loading