DFBUGS-979: Reapply "csi: disable fencing in Rook"

[subhamkrai]

This reverts commit 9ac92c3.

Checklist:

• Commit Message Formatting: Commit titles and messages follow guidelines in the developer guide.
• Reviewed the developer guide on Submitting a Pull Request
• Pending release notes updated with breaking and/or notable changes for the next minor release.
• Documentation has been updated, if necessary.
• Unit tests have been added, if necessary.
• Integration tests have been added, if necessary.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: subhamkrai

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [subhamkrai]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci-robot]

@subhamkrai: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-979](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/DFBUGS-979), which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (odf-4.15.13) matches configured target version for branch (odf-4.15.13)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @mashetty330

In response to this:

This reverts commit 9ac92c3.

Checklist:

• Commit Message Formatting: Commit titles and messages follow guidelines in the developer guide.
• Reviewed the developer guide on Submitting a Pull Request
• Pending release notes updated with breaking and/or notable changes for the next minor release.
• Documentation has been updated, if necessary.
• Unit tests have been added, if necessary.
• Integration tests have been added, if necessary.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: mashetty330.

Note that only red-hat-storage members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@subhamkrai: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-979](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/DFBUGS-979), which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (odf-4.15.13) matches configured target version for branch (odf-4.15.13)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @mashetty330

In response to this:

This reverts commit 9ac92c3.

Checklist:

• Commit Message Formatting: Commit titles and messages follow guidelines in the developer guide.
• Reviewed the developer guide on Submitting a Pull Request
• Pending release notes updated with breaking and/or notable changes for the next minor release.
• Documentation has been updated, if necessary.
• Unit tests have been added, if necessary.
• Integration tests have been added, if necessary.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.