Validate user account value #5305
Conversation
rvykydal
force-pushed
the
validate-user-account-value
branch
from
34619ac to
796db5c
Compare
rvykydal
force-pushed
the
validate-user-account-value
branch
from
796db5c to
ba84fd6
Compare
| setUserAccountInvalidHint(_("Sorry, that user name is not available. Please try another.")); | ||
| } else if (isUserAccountWithInvalidCharacters(userAccount)) { | ||
| valid = false; | ||
| setUserAccountInvalidHint(_("The user name should usually only consist of lower case letters from a-z, digits and the following characters: -_")); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The actually allowed chars are . - and _. I am not sure if we want to diverge from gnome desktop message and mention also . but we could say and the following charcters: ._-
rvykydal
force-pushed
the
validate-user-account-value
branch
from
ba84fd6 to
9e14596
Compare
rvykydal
force-pushed
the
validate-user-account-value
branch
from
9e14596 to
964ee3a
Compare
| userAccount === "root" || | ||
| userAccount === "daemon" || | ||
| userAccount === "home" || | ||
| userAccount === "system" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I could image this list in our config files, but it is probably not necessary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, or it will rather go to the backend with the validation.
Actually I was using wrong branch for the list so I had to extend it a bit and rebase the PR (sorry).
| setUserAccountInvalidHint(_("Sorry, that user name is not available. Please try another.")); | ||
| } else if (isUserAccountWithInvalidCharacters(userAccount)) { | ||
| valid = false; | ||
| setUserAccountInvalidHint(cockpit.format(_("The user name should usually only consist of lower case letters from a-z, digits and the following characters: $0"), "-_")); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just a hint for the future, it makes sense to add new validation methods to the DBus API, because ideally, we want all our user interfaces to use a similar logic.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good idea. I will create a Jira task for this improvement suggestion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Agreed, I was thinking about it as well, as a follow-up.
Hopefully with debouncing it won't have performance issues.
rvykydal
force-pushed
the
validate-user-account-value
branch
from
964ee3a to
0205986
Compare
rvykydal
force-pushed
the
validate-user-account-value
branch
from
0205986 to
63fc98b
Compare
|
Migrating to rhinstaller/anaconda-webui#47 |
The PR is addressing part of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/INSTALLER-3781
There are 3 types of hints/messages for invalid values in the PR - the behavior should be the same as in Gnome Users settings in rawhide (using the same messages including the interpunction). Valid values are the same as in the current Gtk UI (but the Gtk UI has different hints/messages, a bit more fine grained).
Please note that I replaced "username" with "user name" in the validation messages after creating the screenshots (the tests were failing on it).