Possible brew configuration for extensions #78
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thank you for this detailed PR! This foreshadows the challenges we will have going forward as the number of interesting combinations of extensions increases. Initially, this repo tracked RV64GC which would be appropriate for application class linux. By turning on multilib to provide a couple flavors of RV32, we hope to help out some of the embedded community. I'm sure some will benefit from this PR. I also worry, that the current setup (this repo) is not well set up to differentiate different installed extensions. What if this supercharged compiler was advertised as a different formula (perhaps riscv-gnu-toolchain-crypto) users could opt into it? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.