-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 275
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refine fatal error configuration. #423
Open
windelbouwman
wants to merge
1
commit into
ros-industrial:melodic-devel
Choose a base branch
from
windelbouwman:error-handling
base: melodic-devel
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure about this change..
This triggers the state callback on every error message and might a little bit noisy in general
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My idea was that
error_mask_
is used to test for errors which must be logged. Thefatal_error_mask_
is intended for errors which must put the driver in not ready mode (usingsetNotReady
). Is this correct?I like this idea, apart from the recovery strategy, users can configure which errors should be fatal. Another idea would be to simply log all errors, en only allow to configure which errors are fatal.
The concept of "fatal" being the behavior that the driver is put into not ready mode.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Error's should only happen every now and then (arbitration error, ack error). If there are many error's on the bus, it's probably okay to log them? Another strategy could be to rate limit the amount of errors logged, and summarize them, but this would be more work.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Btw, the reason why this change is important, is that in case of an error, every now and then, the driver hangs on "failed to send message".
Now that I think about it, in the current implementation all errors, except the BUS_OFF error can be configured to be ignored, right? Setting the whole bunch of parameters to false will do the trick!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
error_mask
entry will be reported to the error frames callback!We could add a
logging_mask
for this purpose, which could default toerror_mask
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not in favor of adding extra configration. I suggest to move the logging inside the fatal error clause?
I guess the error frame callback is call by calling
setInternalError
?