PWB: Support defining sensitive config values via k8s secrets #535
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Applies to
launcherPem
secureCookieKey
userPassword
database.conf
When doing so, the
rstudio-secret
is skipped and individual mounts containing the above-mentioned secret values are injected.This PR is breaking as the items listed are now maps and existing deployments would need to migrate from
launcherPem: <value>
tolauncherPem.value: <value>
.I've tested this in a deployment of mine and it works as expected so far.
The advantage of this approach is that it gives power to the users and makes use of "simple" k8s secrets instead of relying on some chart magic which puts together a bundled secret from plain config values.
related #520 #493