-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 310
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Itertools::format[_with]
docs mention panic within logging macro
#941
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Itertools::format[_with]
docs mention panic within logging macro
#941
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #941 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 94.38% 94.45% +0.06%
==========================================
Files 48 49 +1
Lines 6665 7086 +421
==========================================
+ Hits 6291 6693 +402
- Misses 374 393 +19 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@Veetaha Does it seem enough to you? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks!
0e90cea
to
86b586f
Compare
@phimuemue CI of recent #943 was unexpectedly long too (20 minutes more) and I don't know why. |
Did we ever think about requiring |
No idea why CI takes so long. I skimmed the individual steps, and they seem to add up to something around 3 minutes. Maybe an infrastructure issue on Github's side? |
#307 mentions adding a About CI, I don't know what it is. I looked at the log, saw a link about curl 8.0 (in rust 1.71) having time issues but it does not seem relevant to us (being at rust 1.78). |
src/lib.rs
Outdated
/// **Panics** if the formatter helper is formatted more than once. | ||
/// ⚠ This can happen unexpectedly and be hard to debug if used in | ||
/// _macros of some logging frameworks_ like `tracing`! ⚠ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A few requests:
- can you give
**Panics**
its own# Header
? - can your provide a
should_panic
doctest example of when this panics
(don't addtracing
as a dev-dependency though, since it has a different MSRV policy) - can you investigate replacing
⚠
with rustdoc's experimental support for first-class warning blocks?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- I can give it its own header.
- I can simulate a
tracing
macro, and hide it by commenting it out. - About replacing
⚠
, we can't use markdown_words_ `tracing`!
inside<div class="warning"></div>
so either full html<i>words</i> <code>tracing</code>
or keep it as is, your call.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jswrenn Done. I can dump the second commit if you finally prefer ⚠
.
…ng macros I failed to make the (invisible) macro usable as `tracing::info!` with some private module. Renamed it `tracing_info` instead. I add `should_panic` but checked it panics for the right reason.
Markdown can not be used inside it. It renders well in the documentation and in my IDE (Sublime Text: orange text).
86b586f
to
df96c73
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A final nit, and then I'm happy to approve!
/// When the formatter helper is formatted more than once. | ||
/// | ||
/// <div class="warning">This can happen unexpectedly and be hard to debug if used in | ||
/// <i>macros of some logging frameworks</i> like <code>tracing</code>!</div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of <code>tracing</code>
, let's link to https://docs.rs/tracing
Closes #667 and maybe #307.
I merely update the docs of
Itertools::format[_with]
, reformulations are welcome: