[do not merge] CI experiments #112049

Kobzol · 2023-05-28T21:07:18Z

Various CI experiments for try/dist builds.

Kobzol · 2023-05-28T21:07:27Z

bors · 2023-05-28T21:07:35Z

⌛ Trying commit c42e33cf36e728937b9e7d9bbb16c17d0b364e23 with merge c60ecf63ab7a2a0a260b0a8ee02adff4f4dbfe87...

bors · 2023-05-28T22:44:38Z

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: c60ecf63ab7a2a0a260b0a8ee02adff4f4dbfe87 (c60ecf63ab7a2a0a260b0a8ee02adff4f4dbfe87)

rust-timer · 2023-05-29T03:49:49Z

Finished benchmarking commit (c60ecf63ab7a2a0a260b0a8ee02adff4f4dbfe87): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.3%	[0.3%, 0.3%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.3%	[0.3%, 0.3%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.3%, -0.3%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.4%	[-0.7%, -0.2%]	9
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.1%	[-0.3%, 0.3%]	3

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	3.4%	[3.4%, 3.4%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.8%	[1.8%, 1.8%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-3.5%	[-3.5%, -3.5%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.4%	[-3.7%, -3.1%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-3.5%, 3.4%]	2

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.0%	[-2.2%, -1.7%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 646.44s -> 646.666s (0.03%)

Kobzol · 2023-05-29T06:14:36Z

Looks like removing libcore from the profile set doesn't hurt much. Now I'll try to also completely remove rustc-perf gathering when gathering LLVM PGO profiles.

Looks like after the initial stage 2 build with an instrumented LLVM, there is already 6 GiB of profiles (after benchmarks it's usually 20 GiB). So instrumenting stage 2 build provides a lot of data! I'll try what happens if we delete the profiles.

@bors try @rust-timer queue

bors · 2023-05-29T06:14:48Z

⌛ Trying commit 31c917d813e3461b6babe1220a1ac15fc66eae53 with merge 3004a6cee0725e571674b0efdefcd9b82b1e11d6...

bors · 2023-05-29T08:17:30Z

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 3004a6cee0725e571674b0efdefcd9b82b1e11d6 (3004a6cee0725e571674b0efdefcd9b82b1e11d6)

Kobzol · 2023-05-29T08:19:19Z

@bors try

bors · 2023-05-29T08:19:28Z

⌛ Trying commit 042e02535bb5a95c8d6d77fc5954d762b73079e0 with merge ed48ba9307a0a1b523e3519499c3918be2dba056...

rust-timer · 2023-05-29T09:33:21Z

Finished benchmarking commit (3004a6cee0725e571674b0efdefcd9b82b1e11d6): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - ACTION NEEDED

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	3.2%	[0.3%, 7.3%]	51
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.1%	[0.4%, 5.9%]	24
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	3.2%	[0.3%, 7.3%]	51

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.5%	[2.5%, 2.5%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.6%	[0.8%, 4.1%]	32
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.8%	[1.8%, 3.6%]	12
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.6%	[0.8%, 4.1%]	32

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 642.999s -> 642.878s (-0.02%)

bors · 2023-05-29T10:34:36Z

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: ed48ba9307a0a1b523e3519499c3918be2dba056 (ed48ba9307a0a1b523e3519499c3918be2dba056)

Kobzol · 2023-05-29T10:56:16Z

@rust-timer build ed48ba9307a0a1b523e3519499c3918be2dba056

rust-timer · 2023-05-29T12:33:22Z

Finished benchmarking commit (ed48ba9307a0a1b523e3519499c3918be2dba056): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.0%	[-2.0%, -0.3%]	33
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.1%	[-1.5%, -0.4%]	12
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.0%	[-2.0%, -0.3%]	33

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.5%	[2.5%, 2.5%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.8%	[-2.8%, -2.8%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 642.999s -> 644.35s (0.21%)

rust-bors · 2025-06-02T09:47:28Z

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 97ba273 (97ba273fa6b06696fc74cd6279568e5c186a854d)

rust-timer · 2025-06-02T11:18:15Z

Finished benchmarking commit (97ba273): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.4%	[0.3%, 0.6%]	25
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.5%	[0.5%, 0.7%]	6
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.6%	[-1.0%, -0.3%]	7
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.4%	[0.3%, 0.6%]	25

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -2.3%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.0%	[0.7%, 1.4%]	4
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.1%	[-8.2%, -0.5%]	16
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results (secondary -0.3%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.8%	[0.4%, 1.9%]	4
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.9%	[-2.8%, -0.4%]	7
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 775.84s -> 777.406s (0.20%)
Artifact size: 372.26 MiB -> 371.11 MiB (-0.31%)

Kobzol · 2025-06-04T17:28:23Z

@bors2 try @rust-timer queue

rust-timer · 2025-06-04T17:28:25Z

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

rust-bors · 2025-06-04T17:28:26Z

⌛ Trying commit 7899c69 with merge 77ab4da…

To cancel the try build, run the command @bors2 try cancel.

[do not merge] CI experiments Various CI experiments for try/dist builds. r? `@ghost`

rust-log-analyzer · 2025-06-04T17:41:05Z

The job mingw-check-tidy failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

info: removing rustup binaries
info: rustup is uninstalled
##[group]Image checksum input
mingw-check-tidy
# We use the ghcr base image because ghcr doesn't have a rate limit
# and the mingw-check-tidy job doesn't cache docker images in CI.
FROM ghcr.io/rust-lang/ubuntu:22.04

ARG DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive
RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends \
  g++ \
---

COPY host-x86_64/mingw-check-1/validate-toolstate.sh /scripts/
COPY host-x86_64/mingw-check-1/validate-error-codes.sh /scripts/

# NOTE: intentionally uses python2 for x.py so we can test it still works.
# validate-toolstate only runs in our CI, so it's ok for it to only support python3.
ENV SCRIPT TIDY_PRINT_DIFF=1 npm install eslint@$(head -n 1 /tmp/eslint.version) && \
 python2.7 ../x.py test --stage 0 src/tools/tidy tidyselftest --extra-checks=py,cpp
#
# This file is autogenerated by pip-compile with Python 3.10
# by the following command:
#
#    pip-compile --allow-unsafe --generate-hashes reuse-requirements.in
---
#15 3.051 Building wheels for collected packages: reuse
#15 3.052   Building wheel for reuse (pyproject.toml): started
#15 3.265   Building wheel for reuse (pyproject.toml): finished with status 'done'
#15 3.266   Created wheel for reuse: filename=reuse-4.0.3-cp310-cp310-manylinux_2_35_x86_64.whl size=132719 sha256=d2a2565e7037ad3883fb9337653f2e25bbb588534fbef3697286cbc26d1bf634
#15 3.266   Stored in directory: /tmp/pip-ephem-wheel-cache-0kvcoqs8/wheels/3d/8d/0a/e0fc6aba4494b28a967ab5eaf951c121d9c677958714e34532
#15 3.268 Successfully built reuse
#15 3.269 Installing collected packages: boolean-py, binaryornot, tomlkit, reuse, python-debian, markupsafe, license-expression, jinja2, chardet, attrs
#15 3.671 Successfully installed attrs-23.2.0 binaryornot-0.4.4 boolean-py-4.0 chardet-5.2.0 jinja2-3.1.4 license-expression-30.3.0 markupsafe-2.1.5 python-debian-0.1.49 reuse-4.0.3 tomlkit-0.13.0
#15 3.671 WARNING: Running pip as the 'root' user can result in broken permissions and conflicting behaviour with the system package manager. It is recommended to use a virtual environment instead: https://pip.pypa.io/warnings/venv
#15 4.221 Collecting virtualenv
#15 4.279   Downloading virtualenv-20.31.2-py3-none-any.whl (6.1 MB)
#15 4.594      ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 6.1/6.1 MB 19.4 MB/s eta 0:00:00
#15 4.661 Collecting filelock<4,>=3.12.2
#15 4.672   Downloading filelock-3.18.0-py3-none-any.whl (16 kB)
#15 4.698 Collecting distlib<1,>=0.3.7
#15 4.708   Downloading distlib-0.3.9-py2.py3-none-any.whl (468 kB)
#15 4.722      ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 469.0/469.0 KB 39.5 MB/s eta 0:00:00
#15 4.762 Collecting platformdirs<5,>=3.9.1
#15 4.773   Downloading platformdirs-4.3.8-py3-none-any.whl (18 kB)
#15 4.855 Installing collected packages: distlib, platformdirs, filelock, virtualenv
#15 5.051 Successfully installed distlib-0.3.9 filelock-3.18.0 platformdirs-4.3.8 virtualenv-20.31.2
#15 5.051 WARNING: Running pip as the 'root' user can result in broken permissions and conflicting behaviour with the system package manager. It is recommended to use a virtual environment instead: https://pip.pypa.io/warnings/venv
#15 DONE 5.1s

#16 [10/11] COPY host-x86_64/mingw-check-1/validate-toolstate.sh /scripts/
#16 DONE 0.0s
---
DirectMap4k:      137152 kB
DirectMap2M:     7202816 kB
DirectMap1G:    11534336 kB
##[endgroup]
Executing TIDY_PRINT_DIFF=1 npm install eslint@$(head -n 1 /tmp/eslint.version) &&  python2.7 ../x.py test --stage 0 src/tools/tidy tidyselftest --extra-checks=py,cpp
+ head -n 1 /tmp/eslint.version
+ TIDY_PRINT_DIFF=1 npm install [email protected]
npm WARN deprecated [email protected]: This module is not supported, and leaks memory. Do not use it. Check out lru-cache if you want a good and tested way to coalesce async requests by a key value, which is much more comprehensive and powerful.
npm WARN deprecated [email protected]: Rimraf versions prior to v4 are no longer supported
npm WARN deprecated @humanwhocodes/[email protected]: Use @eslint/config-array instead
npm WARN deprecated @humanwhocodes/[email protected]: Use @eslint/object-schema instead
npm WARN deprecated [email protected]: Glob versions prior to v9 are no longer supported
npm WARN deprecated [email protected]: This version is no longer supported. Please see https://eslint.org/version-support for other options.

added 89 packages in 3s

17 packages are looking for funding
  run `npm fund` for details
+ python2.7 ../x.py test --stage 0 src/tools/tidy tidyselftest --extra-checks=py,cpp
##[group]Building bootstrap
    Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized] target(s) in 0.05s
##[endgroup]
WARN: currently no CI rustc builds have rustc debug assertions enabled. Please either set `rust.debug-assertions` to `false` if you want to use download CI rustc or set `rust.download-rustc` to `false`.
downloading https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/2025-05-27/rustfmt-nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz
---
fmt: checked 6036 files
tidy check
Running eslint on rustdoc JS files
tidy: Skipping binary file check, read-only filesystem
removing old virtual environment
creating virtual environment at '/checkout/obj/build/venv' using 'python3.10' and 'venv'
creating virtual environment at '/checkout/obj/build/venv' using 'python3.10' and 'virtualenv'
Requirement already satisfied: pip in ./build/venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages (25.1.1)
linting python files
All checks passed!
checking python file formatting
28 files already formatted
checking C++ file formatting
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:3:1: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
#include "llvm-c/Core.h"
^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:65:56: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
extern "C" void LLVMRustTimeTraceProfilerInitialize() {
                                                       ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:66:33: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    timeTraceProfilerInitialize(
                                ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:67:42: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            /* TimeTraceGranularity */ 0,
                                         ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:71:58: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
extern "C" void LLVMRustTimeTraceProfilerFinishThread() {
                                                         ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:75:72: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
extern "C" void LLVMRustTimeTraceProfilerFinish(const char *FileName) {
                                                                       ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:76:35: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    auto FN = StringRef(FileName);
                                  ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:77:24: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    std::error_code EC;
                       ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:78:64: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    auto OS = raw_fd_ostream(FN, EC, sys::fs::CD_CreateAlways);
                                                               ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:80:32: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    timeTraceProfilerWrite(OS);
                               ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:208:31: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
struct LLVMRustThinLTOBuffer {
                              ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:209:22: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    std::string data;
                     ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:214:58: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
                                   const char *Feature) {
                                                         ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:215:40: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    TargetMachine *Target = unwrap(TM);
                                       ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:216:66: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    const MCSubtargetInfo *MCInfo = Target->getMCSubtargetInfo();
                                                                 ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:220:31: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
enum class LLVMRustCodeModel {
                              ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:221:10: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    Tiny,
         ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:222:11: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    Small,
          ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:223:12: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    Kernel,
           ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:224:12: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    Medium,
           ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:225:11: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    Large,
          ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:229:75: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
static std::optional<CodeModel::Model> fromRust(LLVMRustCodeModel Model) {
                                                                          ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:230:21: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    switch (Model) {
                    ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:231:38: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustCodeModel::Tiny:
                                     ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:232:36: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return CodeModel::Tiny;
                                   ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:233:39: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustCodeModel::Small:
                                      ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:234:37: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return CodeModel::Small;
                                    ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:235:40: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustCodeModel::Kernel:
                                       ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:236:38: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return CodeModel::Kernel;
                                     ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:237:40: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustCodeModel::Medium:
                                       ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:238:38: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return CodeModel::Medium;
                                     ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:239:39: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustCodeModel::Large:
                                      ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:240:37: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return CodeModel::Large;
                                    ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:241:38: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustCodeModel::None:
                                     ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:242:33: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return std::nullopt;
                                ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:243:17: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        default:
                ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:244:50: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            report_fatal_error("Bad CodeModel.");
                                                 ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:248:37: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
enum class LLVMRustCodeGenOptLevel {
                                    ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:249:10: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    None,
         ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:250:10: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    Less,
         ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:251:13: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    Default,
            ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:257:69: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
static CodeGenOptLevelEnum fromRust(LLVMRustCodeGenOptLevel Level) {
                                                                    ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:258:21: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    switch (Level) {
                    ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:259:44: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustCodeGenOptLevel::None:
                                           ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:260:46: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return CodeGenOptLevelEnum::None;
                                             ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:261:44: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustCodeGenOptLevel::Less:
                                           ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:262:46: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return CodeGenOptLevelEnum::Less;
                                             ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:263:47: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustCodeGenOptLevel::Default:
                                              ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:264:49: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return CodeGenOptLevelEnum::Default;
                                                ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:265:50: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustCodeGenOptLevel::Aggressive:
                                                 ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:266:52: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return CodeGenOptLevelEnum::Aggressive;
                                                   ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:267:17: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        default:
                ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:268:56: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            report_fatal_error("Bad CodeGenOptLevel.");
                                                       ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:272:41: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
enum class LLVMRustPassBuilderOptLevel {
                                        ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:273:8: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    O0,
       ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:274:8: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    O1,
       ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:275:8: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    O2,
       ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:276:8: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    O3,
       ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:277:8: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    Os,
       ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:281:71: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
static OptimizationLevel fromRust(LLVMRustPassBuilderOptLevel Level) {
                                                                      ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:282:21: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    switch (Level) {
                    ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:283:46: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustPassBuilderOptLevel::O0:
                                             ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:284:42: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return OptimizationLevel::O0;
                                         ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:285:46: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustPassBuilderOptLevel::O1:
                                             ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:286:42: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return OptimizationLevel::O1;
                                         ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:287:46: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustPassBuilderOptLevel::O2:
                                             ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:288:42: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return OptimizationLevel::O2;
                                         ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:289:46: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustPassBuilderOptLevel::O3:
                                             ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:290:42: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return OptimizationLevel::O3;
                                         ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:291:46: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustPassBuilderOptLevel::Os:
                                             ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:292:42: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return OptimizationLevel::Os;
                                         ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:293:46: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustPassBuilderOptLevel::Oz:
                                             ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:294:42: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return OptimizationLevel::Oz;
                                         ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:295:17: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        default:
                ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:296:60: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            report_fatal_error("Bad PassBuilderOptLevel.");
                                                           ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:300:32: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
enum class LLVMRustRelocModel {
                               ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:301:12: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    Static,
           ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:302:9: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    PIC,
        ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:303:18: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    DynamicNoPic,
                 ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:304:10: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    ROPI,
         ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:305:10: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    RWPI,
         ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:309:61: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
static Reloc::Model fromRust(LLVMRustRelocModel RustReloc) {
                                                            ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:310:25: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    switch (RustReloc) {
                        ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:311:41: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustRelocModel::Static:
                                        ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:312:34: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return Reloc::Static;
                                 ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:313:38: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustRelocModel::PIC:
                                     ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:314:32: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return Reloc::PIC_;
                               ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:315:47: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustRelocModel::DynamicNoPic:
                                              ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:316:40: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return Reloc::DynamicNoPIC;
                                       ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:317:39: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustRelocModel::ROPI:
                                      ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:318:32: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return Reloc::ROPI;
                               ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:319:39: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustRelocModel::RWPI:
                                      ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:320:32: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return Reloc::RWPI;
                               ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:321:43: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustRelocModel::ROPIRWPI:
                                          ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:322:37: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return Reloc::ROPI_RWPI;
                                    ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:323:6: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    }
     ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:327:30: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
enum class LLVMRustFloatABI {
                             ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:328:13: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    Default,
            ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:329:10: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    Soft,
         ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:333:67: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
static FloatABI::ABIType fromRust(LLVMRustFloatABI RustFloatAbi) {
                                                                  ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:334:28: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    switch (RustFloatAbi) {
                           ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:335:40: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustFloatABI::Default:
                                       ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:336:38: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return FloatABI::Default;
                                     ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:337:37: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustFloatABI::Soft:
                                    ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:338:35: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return FloatABI::Soft;
                                  ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:339:37: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        case LLVMRustFloatABI::Hard:
                                    ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:340:35: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            return FloatABI::Hard;
                                  ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:341:6: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    }
     ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:346:9: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
template<typename KV>
        ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:346:22: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
template<typename KV>
                     ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:347:58: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
static size_t getLongestEntryLength(ArrayRef<KV> Table) {
                                                         ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:348:23: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    size_t MaxLen = 0;
                      ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:349:17: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    for (auto &I: Table)
                ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:349:25: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    for (auto &I: Table)
                        ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:350:55: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        MaxLen = std::max(MaxLen, std::strlen(I.Key));
                                                      ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:355:64: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
                                        RustStringRef OutStr) {
                                                               ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:356:44: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    ArrayRef<SubtargetSubTypeKV> CPUTable =
                                           ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:357:77: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            unwrap(TM)->getMCSubtargetInfo()->getAllProcessorDescriptions();
                                                                            ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:358:44: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    auto OS = RawRustStringOstream(OutStr);
                                           ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:360:81: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    // Just print a bare list of target CPU names, and let Rust-side code handle
                                                                                ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:361:53: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    // the full formatting of `--print=target-cpus`.
                                                    ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:362:19: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    for (auto &CPU: CPUTable) {
                  ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:362:32: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    for (auto &CPU: CPUTable) {
                               ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:363:31: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        OS << CPU.Key << "\n";
                              ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:367:76: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
extern "C" size_t LLVMRustGetTargetFeaturesCount(LLVMTargetMachineRef TM) {
                                                                           ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:368:46: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    const TargetMachine *Target = unwrap(TM);
                                             ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:369:66: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    const MCSubtargetInfo *MCInfo = Target->getMCSubtargetInfo();
                                                                 ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:370:51: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    const ArrayRef<SubtargetFeatureKV> FeatTable =
                                                  ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:371:47: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            MCInfo->getAllProcessorFeatures();
                                              ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:377:62: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
                                         const char **Desc) {
                                                             ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:378:46: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    const TargetMachine *Target = unwrap(TM);
                                             ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:379:66: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    const MCSubtargetInfo *MCInfo = Target->getMCSubtargetInfo();
                                                                 ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:380:51: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    const ArrayRef<SubtargetFeatureKV> FeatTable =
                                                  ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:381:47: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            MCInfo->getAllProcessorFeatures();
                                              ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:382:54: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    const SubtargetFeatureKV Feat = FeatTable[Index];
                                                     ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:383:25: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    *Feature = Feat.Key;
                        ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:387:55: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
extern "C" const char *LLVMRustGetHostCPUName(size_t * OutLen) {
                                                      ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:387:65: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
extern "C" const char *LLVMRustGetHostCPUName(size_t * OutLen) {
                                                                ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:388:44: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    StringRef Name = sys::getHostCPUName();
                                           ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:389:27: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    *OutLen = Name.size();
                          ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:393:61: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
extern "C" LLVMTargetMachineRef LLVMRustCreateTargetMachine(
                                                            ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:394:69: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        const char *TripleStr, const char *CPU, const char *Feature,
                                                                    ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:395:84: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        const char *ABIStr, LLVMRustCodeModel RustCM, LLVMRustRelocModel RustReloc,
                                                                                   ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:396:81: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        LLVMRustCodeGenOptLevel RustOptLevel, LLVMRustFloatABI RustFloatABIType,
                                                                                ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:397:75: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        bool FunctionSections, bool DataSections, bool UniqueSectionNames,
                                                                          ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:398:66: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        bool TrapUnreachable, bool Singlethread, bool VerboseAsm,
                                                                 ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:399:80: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        bool EmitStackSizeSection, bool RelaxELFRelocations, bool UseInitArray,
                                                                               ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:400:63: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        const char *SplitDwarfFile, const char *OutputObjFile,
                                                              ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:401:63: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        const char *DebugInfoCompression, bool UseEmulatedTls,
                                                              ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:402:60: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        const char *ArgsCstrBuff, size_t ArgsCstrBuffLen) {
                                                           ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:404:44: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    auto OptLevel = fromRust(RustOptLevel);
                                           ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:405:35: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    auto RM = fromRust(RustReloc);
                                  ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:406:32: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    auto CM = fromRust(RustCM);
                               ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:407:52: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    auto FloatABIType = fromRust(RustFloatABIType);
                                                   ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:409:23: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    std::string Error;
                      ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:410:54: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    auto Trip = Triple(Triple::normalize(TripleStr));
                                                     ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:411:36: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    const llvm::Target *TheTarget =
                                   ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:412:67: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
            TargetRegistry::lookupTarget(Trip.getTriple(), Error);
                                                                  ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:413:32: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    if (TheTarget == nullptr) {
                               ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:414:45: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        LLVMRustSetLastError(Error.c_str());
                                            ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:415:24: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
        return nullptr;
                       ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:416:6: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]
    }
     ^
/checkout/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/PassWrapper.cpp:418:78: error: code should be clang-formatted [-Wclang-format-violations]

rust-bors · 2025-06-04T17:55:48Z

💔 Test failed

CI ❌

Kobzol · 2025-06-06T12:00:58Z

r? kobzol

Kobzol · 2025-06-06T12:01:18Z

r? @Kobzol

jieyouxu · 2025-06-06T12:13:11Z

r? jieyouxu

@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-review

rustbot · 2025-06-06T12:13:15Z

jieyouxu is not on the review rotation at the moment.
They may take a while to respond.

rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 28, 2023

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label May 28, 2023

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rustbot added perf-regression Performance regression. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels May 29, 2023

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label May 29, 2023

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label May 29, 2023

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rustbot removed the perf-regression Performance regression. label May 29, 2023

rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 2, 2025

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rustbot added perf-regression Performance regression. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels Jun 2, 2025

WIP

7899c69

Kobzol force-pushed the pgo-omit-benchmarks branch from 9d2a460 to 7899c69 Compare June 4, 2025 17:28

rustbot added the A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. label Jun 4, 2025

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2025

Auto merge of #112049 - Kobzol:pgo-omit-benchmarks, r=<try>

77ab4da

[do not merge] CI experiments Various CI experiments for try/dist builds. r? `@ghost`

rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 4, 2025

Kobzol removed their assignment Jun 6, 2025

rustbot assigned Kobzol Jun 6, 2025

Kobzol removed their assignment Jun 6, 2025

rustbot assigned Kobzol Jun 6, 2025

Kobzol mentioned this pull request Jun 6, 2025

Edge case: suppress off-rotation or exceeds-capacity message when self-r?? rust-lang/triagebot#2058

Closed

rustbot assigned jieyouxu and unassigned Kobzol Jun 6, 2025

rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 6, 2025

jieyouxu assigned Kobzol and unassigned jieyouxu Jun 6, 2025

[do not merge] CI experiments #112049

Are you sure you want to change the base?

[do not merge] CI experiments #112049

Uh oh!

Conversation

Kobzol commented May 28, 2023 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Kobzol commented May 28, 2023

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

bors commented May 28, 2023

Uh oh!

bors commented May 28, 2023

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

rust-timer commented May 29, 2023

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Uh oh!

Kobzol commented May 29, 2023

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

bors commented May 29, 2023

Uh oh!

bors commented May 29, 2023

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

Kobzol commented May 29, 2023

Uh oh!

bors commented May 29, 2023

Uh oh!

rust-timer commented May 29, 2023

Overall result: ❌ regressions - ACTION NEEDED

Uh oh!

bors commented May 29, 2023

Uh oh!

Kobzol commented May 29, 2023

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

rust-timer commented May 29, 2023

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Uh oh!

rust-bors bot commented Jun 2, 2025

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

rust-timer commented Jun 2, 2025

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Uh oh!

Kobzol commented Jun 4, 2025

Uh oh!

rust-timer commented Jun 4, 2025

Uh oh!

rust-bors bot commented Jun 4, 2025

Uh oh!

rust-log-analyzer commented Jun 4, 2025

Uh oh!

rust-bors bot commented Jun 4, 2025

Uh oh!

Kobzol commented Jun 6, 2025

Uh oh!

Kobzol commented Jun 6, 2025

Uh oh!

jieyouxu commented Jun 6, 2025

Uh oh!

rustbot commented Jun 6, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Kobzol commented May 28, 2023 •

edited

Loading