[DO NOT MERGE] bootstrap with -Znext-solver=globally
#133502
Draft
+410
−161
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
compiler-errors
force-pushed
the
rust4
branch
from
c3ef9cd
to
f631ca8
Compare
|
@bors try |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 27, 2024
[DO NOT MERGE] bootstrap with `-Znext-solver=globally` A revival of rust-lang#124812. Current status, we're failing in: - failing in `rustc_next_trait_solver` with 126 instances of the following error ``` error[E0311]: the parameter type `I` may not live long enough | help: consider adding an explicit lifetime bound --> compiler/rustc_next_trait_solver/src/solve/trait_goals.rs:624:53 | 624 ~ fn consider_structural_builtin_unsize_candidates<'a>( 625 ~ ecx: &mut EvalCtxt<'a, D>, 626 | goal: Goal<I, Self>, 627 ~ ) -> Vec<Candidate<I>> where I: 'a { ``` - `itertools` hangs, we're already encountered this hang in our previous attempt due to large type sizes. I believe that it's simply caused by a missing cache somewhere, potentially in `wf.rs`, but other visitors may also be responsible. See rust-itertools/itertools#945 for more details ### commits - rust-lang#133501 - rust-lang#133493 - 9456bfe and b21b116 reimplement candidate preference based on rust-lang#132325, not yet a separate PR - c3ef9cd is a rebased version of rust-lang#125334, unsure whether I actually want to land this PR for now r? `@ghost`
|
I also pushed:
I think this is sufficient to make the compiler build, or at least |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #133527) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
|
Next failure is on
pub fn repro() -> impl FnMut() {
if true {
|| ()
} else {
|| ()
}
} |
compiler-errors
force-pushed
the
rust4
branch
from
f631ca8
to
6210ed3
Compare
|
@bors try |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 27, 2024
[DO NOT MERGE] bootstrap with `-Znext-solver=globally` A revival of rust-lang#124812. Current status: `./x.py b --stage 2` passes 🎉 ### commits - rust-lang#133501 - rust-lang#133493 - 9456bfe and b21b116 reimplement candidate preference based on rust-lang#132325, not yet a separate PR - c3ef9cd is a rebased version of rust-lang#125334, unsure whether I actually want to land this PR for now - rust-lang#133517 * rust-lang#133518 * rust-lang#133519 * rust-lang#133520 * rust-lang#133521 * rust-lang#133524 r? `@ghost`
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
compiler-errors
force-pushed
the
rust4
branch
from
6210ed3
to
8fa8f40
Compare
|
@bors try |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 27, 2024
[DO NOT MERGE] bootstrap with `-Znext-solver=globally` A revival of rust-lang#124812. Current status: `./x.py b --stage 2` passes 🎉 ### commits - rust-lang#133501 - rust-lang#133493 - 9456bfe and b21b116 reimplement candidate preference based on rust-lang#132325, not yet a separate PR - c3ef9cd is a rebased version of rust-lang#125334, unsure whether I actually want to land this PR for now - rust-lang#133517 * rust-lang#133518 * rust-lang#133519 * rust-lang#133520 * rust-lang#133521 * rust-lang#133524 r? `@ghost`
|
I was reducing the new failure but you've already fixed it ^^ |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #133619) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
compiler-errors
force-pushed
the
rust4
branch
from
26b4c46
to
edd157a
Compare
rustbot
added
the
A-query-system
|
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-perf
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2024
[DO NOT MERGE] bootstrap with `-Znext-solver=globally` A revival of rust-lang#124812. Current status: ~~`./x.py b --stage 2` passes 🎉~~ `try` builds succeed 🎉 🎉 🎉 ### commits - rust-lang#133643 - ce66d92 is a rebased version of rust-lang#125334, unsure whether I actually want to land this PR for now * rust-lang#133559 * rust-lang#133558 r? `@ghost`
|
⌛ Trying commit edd157a with merge 3de81bd29354b23a3b553cc00b255661e811dc55... |
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Finished benchmarking commit (3de81bd): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - BENCHMARK(S) FAILEDBenchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @bors rollup=never ❗ ❗ ❗ ❗ ❗
❗ ❗ ❗ ❗ ❗ Instruction countThis is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary 0.3%, secondary -2.3%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResults (primary 198.7%, secondary 115.6%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeResults (primary -0.0%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Bootstrap: 766.885s -> 1001.323s (30.57%) |
rustbot
added
perf-regression
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A revival of #124812.
Current status:
./x.py b --stage 2passes 🎉trybuilds succeed 🎉 🎉 🎉first perf run 👻
commits
adjust_for_branches#133559probe_adt#133558r? @ghost