Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace evaluated cfg_attr in AST with a placeholder attribute for accurate span tracking #133823

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

estebank
Copy link
Contributor

@estebank estebank commented Dec 3, 2024

Previously, when evaluating a #[cfg_attr(..)] to false, the entire attribute was removed from the AST. Afterwards, we insert in its place a #[rustc-cfg-placeholder] attribute so that checks for attributes can still know about their placement. This is particularly relevant when we suggest removing items with cfg_attrs (fix #56328). We use rustc-cfg-placeholder as it is an ident that can't be written by the end user to begin with. We tweak the wording of the existing "unused extern crate" lint.

warning: unused `extern crate`
  --> $DIR/removing-extern-crate.rs:9:1
   |
LL | extern crate removing_extern_crate as foo;
   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ unused
   |
note: the lint level is defined here
  --> $DIR/removing-extern-crate.rs:6:9
   |
LL | #![warn(rust_2018_idioms)]
   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   = note: `#[warn(unused_extern_crates)]` implied by `#[warn(rust_2018_idioms)]`
help: remove the unused `extern crate`
   |
LL - #[cfg_attr(test, macro_use)]
LL - extern crate removing_extern_crate as foo;
   |

r? @petrochenkov

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 3, 2024
…pan tracking

Previously, when evaluating a `#[cfg_attr(..)]` to false, the entire attribute was removed from the AST. Afterwards, we insert in its place a `#[rustc-cfg-placeholder]` attribute so that checks for attributes can still know about their placement. This is particularly relevant when we suggest removing items with `cfg_attr`s (fix rust-lang#56328). We use `rustc-cfg-placeholder` as it is an ident that can't be written by the end user to begin with. We tweak the wording of the existing "unused `extern crate`" lint.

```
warning: unused `extern crate`
  --> $DIR/removing-extern-crate.rs:9:1
   |
LL | extern crate removing_extern_crate as foo;
   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ unused
   |
note: the lint level is defined here
  --> $DIR/removing-extern-crate.rs:6:9
   |
LL | #![warn(rust_2018_idioms)]
   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   = note: `#[warn(unused_extern_crates)]` implied by `#[warn(rust_2018_idioms)]`
help: remove the unused `extern crate`
   |
LL - #[cfg_attr(test, macro_use)]
LL - extern crate removing_extern_crate as foo;
LL +
   |
```
help: remove the unused `extern crate`
|
LL - extern crate core;
LL +
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought this was a rendering bug, but it is because of the //~ removed comment.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@estebank estebank changed the title Replace "false" cfg_attr in AST with a placeholder attribute for accurate span tracking Replace evaluated cfg_attr in AST with a placeholder attribute for accurate span tracking Dec 3, 2024
Avoid "duplicated attribute" lints firing on the cfg placeholder.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 3, 2024

Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy

cc @rust-lang/clippy

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

edition idioms: Incorrect span in extern crate removal
4 participants