Skip to content

Rollup of 9 pull requests #142615

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 24 commits into from

Conversation

workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

@workingjubilee workingjubilee commented Jun 17, 2025

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

bjorn3 and others added 24 commits June 3, 2025 08:55
rustc_std_internal_symbol is meant to call functions from crates where
there is no direct dependency on said crate. As they either have to be
added to symbols.o or rustc has to introduce an implicit dependency on
them to avoid linker errors. The latter is done for some things like the
panic runtime, but adding these symbols to symbols.o allows removing
those implicit dependencies.
This used to be necessary for a correct linker order, but ever since the
introduction of symbols.o adding the symbols in question to symbols.o
would work just as well. We do still add dependencies on the panic runtime
to the local crate, but not for #![needs_panic_runtime] crates.

This also removes the runtime-depends-on-needs-runtime test.
inject_dependency_if used to emit this error, but with symbols.o it is
no longer important that there is no dependency and in fact it may be
nice to have panic_abort and panic_unwind directly depend on libstd in
the future for calling std::process::abort().
You shouldn't ever need to explicitly depend on it. And we weren't
checking that the panic runtime used the correct panic strategy either.
There is already panic-unwind to enable it.
In a PR to emit warnings on misuse of `--print native-static-libs`,
we did not consider the matter of composing parts of build systems.
If you are not directly invoking rustc, it can be difficult to know
when you will in fact compile a staticlib, so making sure everyone
uses `--print native-static-lib` correctly can be just a nuisance.

This reverts the following commits:
- f66787a
- 72a9219
- 98bb597
- c59b708

Next cycle we can reland a slightly more narrowly focused variant or one
that focuses on `--emit` instead of `--print native-static-libs`.
But in its current state, I am not sure the warning is very useful.
this is one-time initialization data, it can just
be a function parameter.

we also move the json parsing into createSrcSidebar
to save a few bytes.
This minimizes the chance of two PRs changing it from N to N+1.
…sleywiser,ibraheemdev

Reduce special casing for the panic runtime

See the individual commits for more info.
Handle win32 separator for cygwin paths

This PR handles a issue that cygwin actually supports Win32 path, so we need to handle the Win32 prefix and separaters.

r? ```@mati865```

cc ```@jeremyd2019```

~~Not sure if I should handle the prefix like the windows target... Cygwin *does* support win32 paths directly going through the APIs, but I think it's not the recommended way.~~

Here I just use `cygwin_conv_path` because it handles both cygwin and win32 paths correctly and convert them into absolute POSIX paths.

UPDATE: Windows path prefix is handled.
…67, r=GuillaumeGomez

rustdoc: make srcIndex no longer a global variable

this is one-time initialization data, it can just
be a function parameter.

while we're doing that, we can more the json parsing into the function and save a few extra bytes of storage for free, at least in the case of multiple crates in a doc bundle.

fixes rust-lang#138467
Update books

## rust-lang/book

1 commits in 634724ea85ebb08a542970bf8871ac8b0f77fd15..4433c9f0cad8460bee05ede040587f8a1fa3f1de
2025-06-03 16:34:00 UTC to 2025-06-03 16:34:00 UTC

- Chapter 11 from tech review (rust-lang/book#4391)

## rust-lang/reference

10 commits in 8e0f593a30f3b56ddb0908fb7ab9249974e08738..d4c66b346f4b72d29e70390a3fa3ea7d4e064db1
2025-06-13 17:05:11 UTC to 2025-06-03 21:28:42 UTC

- Align pattern destructuring with rest of patterns documentation (rust-lang/reference#1853)
- Use extern "system" instead of "stdcall" in example (rust-lang/reference#1854)
- Mention that `thiscall` is a 32-bit calling convention (rust-lang/reference#1855)
- Add doc for keylocker target features (rust-lang/reference#1829)
- Add doc for `sha512`, `sm3` and `sm4` target features (rust-lang/reference#1830)
- Fix(typo): 'though' should be 'through' (rust-lang/reference#1850)
- intro note: make text more simple (rust-lang/reference#1844)
- nit: add missing period (rust-lang/reference#1843)
- add a warning about using `safe` on extern c-variadic functions (rust-lang/reference#1839)
- remove the `safe` keyword from a c-variadic foreign function. (rust-lang/reference#1838)

## rust-lang/rust-by-example

3 commits in 21f4e32b8b40d36453fae16ec07ad4b857c445b6..9baa9e863116cb9524a177d5a5c475baac18928a
2025-06-11 13:00:27 UTC to 2025-06-10 12:43:14 UTC

- introduce new ```@media``` query to set a higher content width on ultra wide screens (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1937)
- Fix syntax highligting (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1935)
- fix(rust-lang#1656): update doc tests to use `playground` as the crate name (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1934)
…t-field-def, r=fmease

Fold unnecessary `visit_struct_field_def` in AstValidator

We don't need it anymore since we removed the `_: struct { }` syntax experiment.
…lds, r=jieyouxu

Make sure to propagate result from `visit_expr_fields`

We weren't propagating the `ControlFlow::Break` out of a struct field, which means that the solution implemented in rust-lang#130443 didn't work for nested fields.

Fixes rust-lang#142525.
…39, r=ChrisDenton

Revert overeager warning for misuse of `--print native-static-libs`

In a PR to emit warnings on misuse of `--print native-static-libs`, we did not consider the matter of composing parts of build systems. If you are not directly invoking rustc, it can be difficult to know when you will in fact compile a staticlib, so making sure uses `--print native-static-lib` correctly can be just a nuisance.

Next cycle we can reland a slightly more narrowly focused variant or one that focuses on `--emit` instead of `--print native-static-libs`. But in its current state, I am not sure the warning is very useful.
…workingjubilee

Set elf e_flags on ppc64 targets according to abi

(This PR contains the non user-facing changes of rust-lang#142321)

Fixes rust-lang#85589 by making sure that ld.lld errors out instead of generating a broken binary.

Basically the problem is that ld.lld assumes that all ppc64 object files with e_flags=0 are object files which use the ELFv2 ABI (this here is the check https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/lld/ELF/Arch/PPC64.cpp#L639).
This pull request sets the correct e_flags to indicate the used ABI so ld.lld errors out when encountering ELFv1 ABI files instead of generating a broken binary.

For example compare code generation for this program (file name ``min.rs``):
```rust
#![feature(no_core, lang_items, repr_simd)]
#![crate_type = "bin"]
#![no_core]
#![no_main]

#[lang = "sized"]
trait Sized {}
#[lang = "copy"]
trait Copy {}
#[lang = "panic_cannot_unwind"]
pub fn panic() -> ! {
    loop {}
}

pub fn my_rad_unmangled_function() {
    loop {}
}

pub fn my_rad_function() {
    loop {}
}

#[no_mangle]
pub fn _start() {
    my_rad_unmangled_function();
    my_rad_function();
}
```
Compile with ``rustc --target=powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu -C linker=ld.lld -C relocation-model=static min.rs``

Before change:
```
$ llvm-objdump -d min
Disassembly of section .text:
000000001001030c <.text>:
		...
10010334: 7c 08 02 a6  	mflr 0
10010338: f8 21 ff 91  	stdu 1, -112(1)
1001033c: f8 01 00 80  	std 0, 128(1)
10010340: 48 02 00 39  	bl 0x10030378 <_ZN3min25my_rad_unmangled_function17h7471c49af58039f5E>
10010344: 60 00 00 00  	nop
10010348: 48 02 00 49  	bl 0x10030390 <_ZN3min15my_rad_function17h37112b8fd1008c9bE>
1001034c: 60 00 00 00  	nop
		...
```
The branch instructions ``bl 0x10030378`` and ``bl 0x10030390`` are jumping into the ``.opd`` section which is data. That is a broken binary (because fixing those branches is the task of the linker).

After change:
```
error: linking with `ld.lld` failed: exit status: 1
  |
  = note:  "ld.lld" "/tmp/rustcNYKZCS/symbols.o" "<1 object files omitted>" "--as-needed" "-L" "/tmp/rustcNYKZCS/raw-dylibs" "-Bdynamic" "--eh-frame-hdr" "-z" "noexecstack" "-L" "<sysroot>/lib/rustlib/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib" "-o" "min" "--gc-sections" "-z" "relro" "-z" "now"
  = note: some arguments are omitted. use `--verbose` to show all linker arguments
  = note: ld.lld: error: /tmp/rustcNYKZCS/symbols.o: ABI version 1 is not supported
```
Which is correct because ld.lld doesn't support ELFv1 ABI.
…, r=aDotInTheVoid

Add a comment to `FORMAT_VERSION`.

This minimizes the chance of two PRs changing it from N to N+1.

Fixes rust-lang#94591.

r? ``@aDotInTheVoid``
@rustbot rustbot added A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc-frontend Relevant to the rustdoc-frontend team, which will review and decide on the web UI/UX output. labels Jun 17, 2025
@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Jun 17, 2025
@workingjubilee workingjubilee deleted the rollup-tk7l5ox branch June 17, 2025 07:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc-frontend Relevant to the rustdoc-frontend team, which will review and decide on the web UI/UX output.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants