Fix tests with scipy 1.16 #40285
Open
Fix tests with scipy 1.16 #40285
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kiwifb
reviewed
Jun 22, 2025
kiwifb
approved these changes
Jun 22, 2025
|
Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit 094ca44; changes) is ready! 🎉 |
user202729
reviewed
Jun 22, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Make tests pass with scipy 1.16:
iprintparameter forl-bfgs-balgorithm.In particular, the tests in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/blob/10.7.beta6/src/sage/numerical/optimize.py#L522-L525 give a completely different answer, which is as meaningless as the previous one since the function does not have a minimum. We mark them as random, since their only purpose is to test that it doesn't throw an error.