Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(lockfile): update dependency framer-motion to v12.2.0 #8505

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: next
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 5, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
framer-motion 12.0.6 -> 12.2.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

motiondivision/motion (framer-motion)

v12.2.0

Compare Source

Added
  • Added unit support to useSpring.

v12.1.0

Compare Source

Fixed
  • Bug with AnimatePresence in React 19 strict mode.
Deprecated
  • Motion 3D.

v12.0.11

Compare Source

Fixed
  • Moving updateSVGDimensions to its own file to help with tree-shaking.

v12.0.10

Compare Source

Fixed
  • Providing MotionValue to motion component from motion/react-client entrypoint.

v12.0.9

Compare Source

Fixed
  • Removing React from bundle.

v12.0.8

Compare Source

Fixed
  • Infer type of children prop for motion.create.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 3am on Monday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner February 5, 2025 08:21
@renovate renovate bot requested review from pedrobonamin and removed request for a team February 5, 2025 08:21
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge February 5, 2025 08:21
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 5, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 5, 2025 10:11am
performance-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 5, 2025 10:11am
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 5, 2025 10:11am
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 5, 2025 10:11am
test-next-studio ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 5, 2025 10:11am

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2025

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2025

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Wed, 05 Feb 2025 10:19:56 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 22.7 efps (44ms) 25.6 efps (39ms) -5ms (-11.4%)
article (body) 72.5 efps (14ms) 75.5 efps (13ms) -1ms (-/-%)
article (string inside object) 23.8 efps (42ms) 26.3 efps (38ms) -4ms (-9.5%)
article (string inside array) 21.3 efps (47ms) 22.7 efps (44ms) -3ms (-6.4%)
recipe (name) 41.7 efps (24ms) 50.0 efps (20ms) -4ms (-16.7%)
recipe (description) 47.6 efps (21ms) 55.6 efps (18ms) -3ms (-14.3%)
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (5ms) 99.9+ efps (5ms) +0ms (-/-%)
synthetic (title) 18.9 efps (53ms) 20.0 efps (50ms) -3ms (-5.7%)
synthetic (string inside object) 20.0 efps (50ms) 20.2 efps (50ms) -1ms (-1.0%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 44ms 50ms 90ms 566ms 965ms 12.6s
article (body) 14ms 16ms 21ms 87ms 318ms 5.1s
article (string inside object) 42ms 44ms 49ms 262ms 331ms 7.2s
article (string inside array) 47ms 49ms 54ms 165ms 311ms 7.5s
recipe (name) 24ms 25ms 28ms 42ms 0ms 8.0s
recipe (description) 21ms 24ms 30ms 52ms 18ms 5.2s
recipe (instructions) 5ms 7ms 8ms 31ms 0ms 3.1s
synthetic (title) 53ms 60ms 80ms 399ms 1360ms 16.0s
synthetic (string inside object) 50ms 55ms 62ms 448ms 1019ms 9.0s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 39ms 43ms 61ms 358ms 161ms 11.6s
article (body) 13ms 15ms 18ms 53ms 49ms 5.0s
article (string inside object) 38ms 40ms 45ms 255ms 301ms 7.3s
article (string inside array) 44ms 47ms 53ms 214ms 326ms 7.5s
recipe (name) 20ms 22ms 26ms 51ms 0ms 7.2s
recipe (description) 18ms 19ms 21ms 42ms 0ms 4.5s
recipe (instructions) 5ms 7ms 8ms 24ms 0ms 3.0s
synthetic (title) 50ms 54ms 60ms 222ms 1071ms 13.8s
synthetic (string inside object) 50ms 55ms 85ms 590ms 1335ms 8.5s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Component Testing Report Updated Feb 5, 2025 10:17 AM (UTC)

❌ Failed Tests (1) -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 4s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 12s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 1m 18s 5 0 1
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 51s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 14s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 27s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 7s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 29s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 2m 1s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 13s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 43s 21 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants