Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency react-rx to ^4.1.19 #8566

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 10, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
react-rx (source) ^4.1.18 -> ^4.1.19 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

sanity-io/react-rx (react-rx)

v4.1.19

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • deps: update React Compiler dependencies 🤖 ✨ (#​224) (7c55e9b)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner February 10, 2025 11:31
@renovate renovate bot requested review from cngonzalez and removed request for a team February 10, 2025 11:31
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge February 10, 2025 11:31
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 10, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio 🔄 Building (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 10, 2025 11:31am
performance-studio 🔄 Building (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 10, 2025 11:31am
studio-workshop 🔄 Building (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 10, 2025 11:31am
test-studio 🔄 Building (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 10, 2025 11:31am
1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
test-next-studio ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 10, 2025 11:31am

Copy link

Removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

🚮 Removed packages: npm/[email protected]

View full report↗︎

@renovate renovate bot added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 10, 2025
Merged via the queue into next with commit 3ab2271 Feb 10, 2025
36 of 40 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/react-rx-4.x branch February 10, 2025 11:34
Copy link
Contributor

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 42.44% 53803 / 126771
🔵 Statements 42.44% 53803 / 126771
🔵 Functions 47.94% 2772 / 5782
🔵 Branches 78.83% 10320 / 13091
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #30063 for commit a2a79df by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

Copy link
Contributor

Component Testing Report Updated Feb 10, 2025 11:45 AM (UTC)

❌ Failed Tests (51) -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 39s 10 0 5
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 7s 2 0 1
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 2m 20s 1 0 5
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 52s 11 1 6
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 15s 4 0 2
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 8s 2 0 1
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 16s 4 0 2
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 40s 10 0 5
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 55s 14 0 7
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 1m 15s 14 0 7
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 7s 2 9 1
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 15s 4 0 2
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 1m 1s 14 0 7
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

Copy link
Contributor

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 11:49:17 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 28.6 efps (35ms) 26.7 efps (38ms) +3ms (+7.1%)
article (body) 75.2 efps (13ms) 78.1 efps (13ms) -1ms (-/-%)
article (string inside object) 29.4 efps (34ms) 27.0 efps (37ms) +3ms (+8.8%)
article (string inside array) 25.3 efps (40ms) 24.4 efps (41ms) +2ms (+3.8%)
recipe (name) 50.0 efps (20ms) 50.0 efps (20ms) +0ms (-/-%)
recipe (description) 55.6 efps (18ms) 55.6 efps (18ms) +0ms (-/-%)
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (6ms) 99.9+ efps (5ms) -1ms (-/-%)
synthetic (title) 18.2 efps (55ms) 20.8 efps (48ms) -7ms (-12.7%)
synthetic (string inside object) 20.0 efps (50ms) 20.4 efps (49ms) -1ms (-2.0%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 35ms 40ms 50ms 244ms 258ms 10.6s
article (body) 13ms 15ms 21ms 85ms 189ms 5.2s
article (string inside object) 34ms 36ms 39ms 158ms 110ms 6.2s
article (string inside array) 40ms 44ms 48ms 107ms 312ms 7.0s
recipe (name) 20ms 22ms 25ms 41ms 0ms 7.3s
recipe (description) 18ms 19ms 22ms 34ms 0ms 4.5s
recipe (instructions) 6ms 7ms 9ms 19ms 0ms 3.1s
synthetic (title) 55ms 63ms 95ms 487ms 1641ms 14.8s
synthetic (string inside object) 50ms 52ms 57ms 434ms 931ms 7.9s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 38ms 40ms 43ms 370ms 323ms 10.5s
article (body) 13ms 14ms 17ms 29ms 82ms 4.5s
article (string inside object) 37ms 40ms 41ms 72ms 118ms 6.5s
article (string inside array) 41ms 44ms 48ms 241ms 292ms 7.1s
recipe (name) 20ms 21ms 26ms 51ms 0ms 7.3s
recipe (description) 18ms 19ms 23ms 45ms 0ms 4.6s
recipe (instructions) 5ms 7ms 7ms 28ms 0ms 3.1s
synthetic (title) 48ms 50ms 67ms 325ms 615ms 12.8s
synthetic (string inside object) 49ms 51ms 55ms 252ms 536ms 7.5s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – performance-studio February 10, 2025 11:50 Inactive
@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – page-building-studio February 10, 2025 11:50 Inactive
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant