Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): dedupe pnpm-lock.yaml #8567

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025
Merged

chore(deps): dedupe pnpm-lock.yaml #8567

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

ecospark[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@ecospark ecospark bot commented Feb 10, 2025

I ran pnpm dedupe πŸ§‘β€πŸ’»

@ecospark ecospark bot requested a review from a team as a code owner February 10, 2025 11:41
@ecospark ecospark bot requested review from pedrobonamin and removed request for a team February 10, 2025 11:41
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 10, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git β†—οΈŽ

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio βœ… Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview πŸ’¬ Add feedback Feb 10, 2025 11:57am
performance-studio βœ… Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview πŸ’¬ Add feedback Feb 10, 2025 11:57am
test-studio βœ… Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview πŸ’¬ Add feedback Feb 10, 2025 11:57am
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 10, 2025 11:57am
test-next-studio ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 10, 2025 11:57am

Copy link
Contributor

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
πŸ”΅ Lines 42.44% 53803 / 126771
πŸ”΅ Statements 42.44% 53803 / 126771
πŸ”΅ Functions 47.94% 2772 / 5782
πŸ”΅ Branches 78.83% 10319 / 13090
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #30070 for commit cd6ca0c by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

Copy link
Contributor

Component Testing Report Updated Feb 10, 2025 11:49 AM (UTC)

❌ Failed Tests (51) -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 39s 10 0 5
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 7s 2 0 1
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 2m 19s 1 0 5
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 50s 11 1 6
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx βœ… Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 15s 4 0 2
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 8s 2 0 1
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 16s 4 0 2
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 40s 10 0 5
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 55s 14 0 7
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 1m 15s 14 0 7
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 7s 2 9 1
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 15s 4 0 2
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 1m 1s 14 0 7
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx βœ… Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx βœ… Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

Copy link
Contributor

⚑️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 11:51:56 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Ξ” (%)
latency difference
recipe (name) 50.0 efps (20ms) 50.0 efps (20ms) +0ms (-/-%) βœ…
recipe (description) 55.6 efps (18ms) 55.6 efps (18ms) +0ms (-/-%) βœ…
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (6ms) 99.9+ efps (5ms) -1ms (-/-%) βœ…
synthetic (title) 18.7 efps (54ms) 20.0 efps (50ms) -4ms (-6.5%) βœ…
synthetic (string inside object) 20.0 efps (50ms) 20.4 efps (49ms) -1ms (-2.0%) βœ…

efps β€” editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
recipe (name) 20ms 22ms 25ms 58ms 1ms 8.2s
recipe (description) 18ms 20ms 22ms 37ms 0ms 4.6s
recipe (instructions) 6ms 7ms 9ms 23ms 0ms 3.0s
synthetic (title) 54ms 62ms 84ms 448ms 1285ms 13.9s
synthetic (string inside object) 50ms 54ms 60ms 414ms 997ms 8.4s

πŸ§ͺ Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
recipe (name) 20ms 22ms 26ms 41ms 0ms 8.4s
recipe (description) 18ms 19ms 21ms 41ms 0ms 4.5s
recipe (instructions) 5ms 7ms 8ms 31ms 0ms 3.1s
synthetic (title) 50ms 54ms 65ms 387ms 1262ms 14.5s
synthetic (string inside object) 49ms 52ms 57ms 336ms 539ms 8.1s

πŸ“š Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark β€” the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency β€” the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 β€” the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 β€” the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 β€” the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time β€” the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration β€” how long the test run took to complete.

@stipsan stipsan added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 10, 2025
Merged via the queue into next with commit 85c0379 Feb 10, 2025
56 of 60 checks passed
@stipsan stipsan deleted the actions/dedupe-if-needed branch February 10, 2025 12:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant