Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency vite to ^6.1.0 #8568

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 10, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
vite (source) ^6.0.11 -> ^6.1.0 age adoption passing confidence

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 3am on the first day of the month" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner February 10, 2025 12:50
@renovate renovate bot requested review from rexxars and removed request for a team February 10, 2025 12:50
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge February 10, 2025 12:50
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 10, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 10, 2025 0:57am
performance-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 10, 2025 0:57am
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 10, 2025 0:57am
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 10, 2025 0:57am
test-next-studio ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 10, 2025 0:57am

@renovate renovate bot added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 10, 2025
Merged via the queue into next with commit d1e08dd Feb 10, 2025
36 of 40 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/vite-6.x branch February 10, 2025 12:54
Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 42.44% 53803 / 126771
🔵 Statements 42.44% 53803 / 126771
🔵 Functions 47.94% 2772 / 5782
🔵 Branches 78.81% 10311 / 13082
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #30076 for commit f425d14 by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

Copy link
Contributor

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:03:24 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 28.6 efps (35ms) 26.3 efps (38ms) +3ms (+8.6%)
article (body) 78.1 efps (13ms) 72.7 efps (14ms) +1ms (-/-%)
article (string inside object) 28.6 efps (35ms) 29.0 efps (35ms) -1ms (-1.4%)
article (string inside array) 25.6 efps (39ms) 25.6 efps (39ms) +0ms (-/-%)
recipe (name) 52.6 efps (19ms) 52.6 efps (19ms) +0ms (-/-%)
recipe (description) 57.1 efps (18ms) 58.8 efps (17ms) -1ms (-2.9%)
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (5ms) 99.9+ efps (5ms) +0ms (-/-%)
synthetic (title) 19.2 efps (52ms) 19.2 efps (52ms) +0ms (-/-%)
synthetic (string inside object) 19.6 efps (51ms) 19.2 efps (52ms) +1ms (+2.0%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 35ms 38ms 42ms 205ms 335ms 11.8s
article (body) 13ms 16ms 25ms 158ms 178ms 4.9s
article (string inside object) 35ms 38ms 43ms 204ms 214ms 6.4s
article (string inside array) 39ms 41ms 49ms 147ms 141ms 6.5s
recipe (name) 19ms 21ms 24ms 43ms 0ms 8.0s
recipe (description) 18ms 19ms 20ms 32ms 0ms 4.5s
recipe (instructions) 5ms 8ms 10ms 29ms 0ms 3.1s
synthetic (title) 52ms 56ms 70ms 456ms 969ms 13.6s
synthetic (string inside object) 51ms 52ms 59ms 115ms 936ms 8.4s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 38ms 41ms 54ms 412ms 291ms 11.6s
article (body) 14ms 16ms 24ms 177ms 293ms 5.3s
article (string inside object) 35ms 37ms 41ms 149ms 112ms 6.6s
article (string inside array) 39ms 41ms 45ms 142ms 143ms 6.5s
recipe (name) 19ms 20ms 22ms 40ms 0ms 6.9s
recipe (description) 17ms 18ms 20ms 35ms 0ms 4.4s
recipe (instructions) 5ms 7ms 8ms 10ms 0ms 3.1s
synthetic (title) 52ms 59ms 67ms 421ms 1054ms 14.6s
synthetic (string inside object) 52ms 54ms 57ms 385ms 1180ms 8.5s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

Copy link
Contributor

Component Testing Report Updated Feb 10, 2025 1:03 PM (UTC)

❌ Failed Tests (51) -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 40s 10 0 5
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 7s 2 0 1
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 2m 20s 1 0 5
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 51s 11 1 6
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 16s 4 0 2
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 8s 2 0 1
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 16s 4 0 2
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 40s 10 0 5
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 55s 14 0 7
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 1m 16s 14 0 7
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 7s 2 9 1
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 16s 4 0 2
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 1m 1s 14 0 7
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant