Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency @portabletext/editor to ^1.32.0 #8575

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 10, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@portabletext/editor (source) ^1.31.2 -> ^1.32.0 age adoption passing confidence

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner February 10, 2025 17:09
@renovate renovate bot requested review from juice49 and removed request for a team February 10, 2025 17:09
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 10, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 10, 2025 8:06pm
performance-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 10, 2025 8:06pm
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 10, 2025 8:06pm
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 10, 2025 8:06pm
test-next-studio ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 10, 2025 8:06pm

@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge February 10, 2025 17:09
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/portabletext-editor-1.x branch from 0232fba to a40115a Compare February 10, 2025 17:13
Copy link
Contributor

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 42.43% 53732 / 126632
🔵 Statements 42.43% 53732 / 126632
🔵 Functions 47.93% 2769 / 5777
🔵 Branches 78.8% 10302 / 13073
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #30122 for commit 73434ee by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 10, 2025

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:10:40 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 26.3 efps (38ms) 27.0 efps (37ms) -1ms (-2.6%)
article (body) 72.7 efps (14ms) 78.1 efps (13ms) -1ms (-/-%)
article (string inside object) 27.0 efps (37ms) 27.8 efps (36ms) -1ms (-2.7%)
article (string inside array) 23.8 efps (42ms) 24.4 efps (41ms) -1ms (-2.4%)
recipe (name) 44.4 efps (23ms) 43.5 efps (23ms) +1ms (+2.2%)
recipe (description) 50.0 efps (20ms) 47.6 efps (21ms) +1ms (+5.0%)
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (8ms) 99.9+ efps (6ms) -2ms (-/-%)
synthetic (title) 20.0 efps (50ms) 21.1 efps (48ms) -3ms (-5.0%)
synthetic (string inside object) 20.2 efps (50ms) 20.4 efps (49ms) -1ms (-1.0%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 38ms 40ms 49ms 471ms 282ms 10.4s
article (body) 14ms 16ms 18ms 70ms 61ms 4.7s
article (string inside object) 37ms 40ms 44ms 216ms 117ms 6.8s
article (string inside array) 42ms 45ms 48ms 201ms 255ms 6.9s
recipe (name) 23ms 25ms 38ms 52ms 4ms 8.0s
recipe (description) 20ms 22ms 23ms 39ms 0ms 4.8s
recipe (instructions) 8ms 10ms 15ms 27ms 0ms 3.4s
synthetic (title) 50ms 53ms 58ms 222ms 582ms 12.3s
synthetic (string inside object) 50ms 52ms 56ms 99ms 323ms 7.3s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 37ms 39ms 44ms 307ms 293ms 10.9s
article (body) 13ms 14ms 17ms 131ms 180ms 4.8s
article (string inside object) 36ms 38ms 42ms 131ms 122ms 6.7s
article (string inside array) 41ms 44ms 48ms 232ms 252ms 7.0s
recipe (name) 23ms 24ms 27ms 43ms 0ms 7.5s
recipe (description) 21ms 21ms 22ms 40ms 0ms 4.8s
recipe (instructions) 6ms 9ms 9ms 20ms 0ms 3.3s
synthetic (title) 48ms 52ms 58ms 329ms 780ms 13.7s
synthetic (string inside object) 49ms 56ms 83ms 427ms 967ms 8.7s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Component Testing Report Updated Feb 10, 2025 8:13 PM (UTC)

❌ Failed Tests (3) -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 9s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 12s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 2m 36s 3 0 3
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 53s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 15s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 27s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 9s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 37s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 2m 5s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 13s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 45s 21 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/portabletext-editor-1.x branch from a40115a to 3b12069 Compare February 10, 2025 19:50
Merged via the queue into next with commit d517632 Feb 10, 2025
51 of 54 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/portabletext-editor-1.x branch February 10, 2025 20:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant