-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 180
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make RSA key size configurable in operator command #2360
Conversation
@rzetelskik: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: rzetelskik. Note that only scylladb members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
release-script job was failing as it's using the latest image which was missing the changes being introduced in this PR, so I had to split the changes in the scripts to a separate one: #2474 |
@rzetelskik: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/cc zimnx mflendrich |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: rzetelskik, zimnx The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Description of your changes: This PR makes RSA key size configurable in the operator command. Changes in CI scripts have to go separately: #2360 (comment).
Prerequisite for #2474.
Which issue is resolved by this Pull Request:
Resolves #
/kind machinery
/priority important-soon
/cc