-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 518
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[perf] use uv for venv creation and pip install #4414
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@romilbhardwaj Rather than conditionally using pip/uv based on what's installed, I just changed the RAY_INSTALLATION_COMMANDS to also install uv if it's missing. I think this is better because we need different behavior between pip and uv, so trying to make things compatible with both is going to get increasingly difficult. As a brief example, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @cg505! It looks mostly good to me. We should run the backward compatibility tests to make sure it works, especially on AWS, GCP, Azure and Kubernetes
sky/skylet/constants.py
Outdated
'if [ "{cloud}" = "azure" ]; then ' | ||
f'{SKY_UV_PIP_CMD} install --prerelease=allow "azure-cli>=2.65.0"; fi;' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should search for all occurence of azure-cli
across the project and pip installs. Are we planning to install the dependencies with uv
for controller dependencies as well?
skypilot/sky/utils/controller_utils.py
Line 232 in 1b3c277
'pip install "azure-cli>=2.31.0" azure-core ' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh wow, I didn't know about this code. We should definitely fix this up. To be clear, everything should work as-is but ideally we would move this all to uv as well.
There are no other relevant mentions of azure-cli in the repo.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @cg505!
sky/skylet/constants.py
Outdated
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ | |||
'which python3') | |||
# Python executable, e.g., /opt/conda/bin/python3 | |||
SKY_PYTHON_CMD = f'$({SKY_GET_PYTHON_PATH_CMD})' | |||
# Prefer SKY_UV_PIP_CMD, which is faster. TODO(cooper): remove all usages. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mention the reason in the comment for why we keep this for future reference.
sky/setup_files/setup.py
Outdated
sys.path.append(SETUP_FILE_DIR) | ||
import dependencies |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
dependencies
seems not included in this PR?
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ | |||
from sky.jobs import utils as managed_job_utils |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is awesome!
Ran backwards compatibility tests as shown in PR description. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for adding this @cg505! We may want to run some tests in a clean env: tests for normal launches and jobs/serve with new controller set up by this PR.
sky/setup_files/setup.py
Outdated
# setuptools does not include the script dir on the search path, so manually add | ||
# it so that we can import the dependencies file. | ||
sys.path.append(SETUP_FILE_DIR) | ||
import dependencies # pylint: disable=wrong-import-position |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this a common practice?
Would it cause any issue with our wheel building during sky launch
? Would be great if we can test it in a clean env, e.g. start a new container for running some tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tested the wheel build command manually as well as sky launch to make sure this would work. I looked for information on whether this is common practice but couldn't find any useful info.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I found this: pypa/setuptools#3134
Obviously it's not ideal to hack sys.path. We could use importlib as suggested there. What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
python build systems are so complicated...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated this to use runpy.run_path, which seems a lot cleaner.
sky/utils/controller_utils.py
Outdated
f'uv -V > /dev/null 2>&1 ||' | ||
'curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh 2>/dev/null |' | ||
'UV_INSTALL_DIR="$HOME/.local/bin" sh >/dev/null 2>&1') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just curious, should we just use uv setup in our provision setup, i.e. use {constants.UV_PIP_CMD}
directly?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, we use {{ sky_activate_python_env }}
in jobs controller yml to make sure pip install goes to the separate env we created. Will the new changes cause any issue?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We probably could use SKY_UV_PIP_CMD - I didn't because the existing code wasn't using SKY_PIP_CMD.
Activating the python env normally should work correctly with uv.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated to use the commands from skylet.constants.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @cg505! It looks mostly good to me with a small comment below
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @cg505! LGTM.
Can we have a quick number for the performance improvement in the PR description, for future reference?
Co-authored-by: Zhanghao Wu <[email protected]>
This was previously merged in as #4394, which was reverted in #4401 due to a bug.
This PR:
--seed
flag withuv venv
to make sure pip is installed in the venvAzure bug:
uv pip install skypilot[azure]
would fail to install azure-cli and complain as follows:This is because azure-cli directly depends on a pre-release version of
azure-keyvault-administration
(and several other packages). Normal pip handles this by allowing the pre-release version since it's specified as an explicit version requirement, howeveruv
by default does not consider pre-releases at all. See https://docs.astral.sh/uv/pip/compatibility/#pre-release-compatibility.We don't want to use
uv pip install --prerelease=allow skypilot[azure]
because this will allow pre-release versions to satisfy any dependency, not just these explicitly specified ones. I tested this and the resolved version was different for a few packages. This seems like an unacceptable difference, especially since we will be unnecessarily relying on pre-release packages.Once azure-cli is installed,
uv pip install skypilot[azure]
will work just fine, since it doesn't need to worry about resolving azure-cli's dependencies. So, we just need to find a way to install azure-cli.pip install azure-cli
works, but it's VERY slow (takes >60s on my machine).uv pip install --prerelease=allow azure-cli
is much faster, so I went with this.Technically,
uv pip install --prerelease=allow azure-cli
uses different resolution thanpip install azure-cli
, for the same reason described above for installingskypilot[azure]
. However, I tested this, and in practice only one package has a different version. (azure-mgmt-search 9.1.0 -> 9.2.0b2)Tested (run the relevant ones):
bash format.sh
pytest tests/test_smoke.py
pytest tests/test_smoke.py::test_fill_in_the_name
conda deactivate; bash -i tests/backward_compatibility_tests.sh