Skip to content

feat(language-server): integrate LS #5820

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2025

Conversation

Team-Hammerhead
Copy link
Collaborator

@Team-Hammerhead Team-Hammerhead commented Apr 8, 2025

Changes since last integration of Language Server

commit 0a3a8f61bc2897cbef1b84e09b1a9bd73b3c724e
Author: Abdelrahman Shawki Hassan <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue Apr 8 16:02:03 2025 +0200

    fix: disable explain (#826)

:100644 100644 94b81e03 ca297e79 M	infrastructure/code/ai_fix_handler.go

commit 4224185540279210bf239cc4fde5d38bc9fcd9e7
Author: Zdroba <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue Apr 8 12:19:39 2025 +0300

    fix: update code-client-go version and LS usage [IDE-1098] (#816)
    
    Co-authored-by: Abdelrahman Shawki Hassan <[email protected]>
    Co-authored-by: Andrew Robinson Hodges <[email protected]>

:100644 100644 ea373e45 dd3ff238 M	go.mod
:100644 100644 6011149c a6d33deb M	go.sum
:100644 100644 dfa2b0b1 94b81e03 M	infrastructure/code/ai_fix_handler.go

@Team-Hammerhead Team-Hammerhead requested a review from a team as a code owner April 8, 2025 09:33
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 8, 2025

Warnings
⚠️

"feat: automatic integration of language server 0a3a8f61bc2897cbef1b84e09b1a9bd73b3c724e" is too long. Keep the first line of your commit message under 72 characters.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 92de43b

@team-ide-user team-ide-user force-pushed the feat/automatic-upgrade-of-ls branch from 5af6da9 to 92de43b Compare April 8, 2025 14:16
@Team-Hammerhead Team-Hammerhead merged commit 21a9a86 into main Apr 8, 2025
9 checks passed
@Team-Hammerhead Team-Hammerhead deleted the feat/automatic-upgrade-of-ls branch April 8, 2025 14:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants