-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bjorn/cnx-1112-get-user-facing-names-of-properties #526
bjorn/cnx-1112-get-user-facing-names-of-properties #526
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #526 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 17.35% 17.35%
=======================================
Files 239 239
Lines 4805 4805
Branches 579 579
=======================================
Hits 834 834
Misses 3941 3941
Partials 30 30 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Converters/CSi/Speckle.Converters.CSiShared/Utils/DictionaryUtils.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...erters/CSi/Speckle.Converters.ETABSShared/ToSpeckle/Helpers/EtabsFramePropertiesExtractor.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@@ -98,20 +99,17 @@ private void GetPropertyModifiers(string sectionName, Dictionary<string, object? | |||
Dictionary<string, object?> modifiers = | |||
new() | |||
{ | |||
["crossSectionalAreaModifier"] = stiffnessModifiersArray[0], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we don't have property naming standards atm, but the standing rule is using the api prop name in camelcase with no spaces. would prefer to keep this convention for now, but not critical
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc'ing @bimgeek. I think we'll need to formalize this for all (either camel or user facing).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since we are using user-facing property names in Revit, I understand that this is our target in other connectors for data extraction workflows as it's easier to navigate. However, @clairekuang knows better.
Description & motivation
Changes:
Screenshots:
Frame Section Properties
Shell Section Properties
Section Proxies Properties
Material Proxies Properties
Checklist: