-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cluster based on e-value/tmscore ? #364
Comments
cluster by e-value : foldseek easy-cluster pdb/ merge tmp/ -c 0.8 |
I think It might be based on tmscore, becasue my clustered groups by default settings
However, we can see the default setting of alignment type is 2: 3Di+AA. I'm not sure whether it also calculates tmscore during this alignment type. |
The threshold you set is crucial. Here are some parameters to consider:
|
Expected Behavior
When i run the easy-cluster wih a set of rfdiffusion generated structures, i obeserve that with foldseek cluster program which based e-value will give the ooposite trend, compared to cluster based on tm-score threshold(tmscore cutoff 0.6)
Current Behavior
The light blue is the total count of scaffold of each length, the drak blue is the count of clusters, why when use e-values there will be less cluster when length increase while use tm-score the trend is opposite?
what;s your recommondation cluster creterion when calculates the structure diversity of structure generation model?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: