Skip to content

Conversation

shantanujoshi25
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

  • Strengths:

    • The student has demonstrated a strong understanding of time and space complexity, providing optimal solutions for each problem.
    • The code is clean, readable, and follows good practices.
    • The student has effectively used Python's features to write concise and efficient code.
  • Areas for Improvement:

    • In Problem_1.1.py, the initial assignment output = [i for i in nums] is unnecessary since the values in output are overwritten immediately. The student could initialize output as [1] * len(nums) to avoid this redundancy.
    • In Problem_1.2.py, the condition while(i<m and j<n) could be more explicitly checked against the matrix dimensions to ensure clarity.
    • In Problem_1.3.py, the variable names min_n, max_n, min_m, max_m could be more descriptive, such as top, bottom, left, right to better reflect their roles in the spiral traversal.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

  • Strengths:
    • The student has demonstrated a strong understanding of the problems and has provided optimal solutions in terms of both time and space complexity.
    • The code is clean, readable, and follows good practices.
  • Areas for Improvement:
    • Adding comments to explain the logic, especially for the two-pass approach in Problem_1.1.py and the direction changes in Problem_1.2.py and Problem_1.3.py, would enhance readability and maintainability.
    • In Problem_1.1.py, the initial assignment output = [i for i in nums] is unnecessary since the values are overwritten immediately. This could be simplified to output = [1] * len(nums).

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

The student has demonstrated a good understanding of the problems and has provided efficient solutions. However, there are a few areas for improvement:

  1. Space Complexity: In Problem_1.1.py, the space complexity is O(n) due to the output array, not O(1). The student should ensure accurate complexity analysis.
  2. Initialization: In Problem_1.1.py, initializing output with a list comprehension is redundant since the values are immediately overwritten. A simpler initialization like output = [1] * len(nums) would suffice.
  3. Comments: Adding comments to explain the logic, especially in Problem_1.2.py and Problem_1.3.py, would enhance readability and maintainability.

Overall, the student's solutions are correct and efficient, but attention to detail in complexity analysis and code initialization would improve the quality further.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants