Skip to content

Conversation

Paneripatel
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

  1. Correctness:

    • Problem 1 (productExceptSelf): The solution correctly implements the product of array except self without using division and in O(n) time. It uses a two-pass approach (left and right) to compute the product, which is a standard and efficient method.
    • Problem 2 (findDiagonalOrder): The solution correctly traverses the matrix in a diagonal order, handling the direction changes appropriately. It covers all edge cases like single-row or single-column matrices.
    • Problem 3 (spiralOrder): The solution correctly implements the spiral order traversal of the matrix, handling the boundaries and direction changes effectively. It works for both square and rectangular matrices.
  2. Time Complexity:

    • Problem 1: O(n) - The solution performs two passes over the array, each of O(n) time.
    • Problem 2: O(m*n) - The solution traverses each element of the matrix exactly once.
    • Problem 3: O(m*n) - The solution traverses each element of the matrix exactly once.
  3. Space Complexity:

    • Problem 1: O(1) - The solution uses constant extra space (excluding the output array), as required.
    • Problem 2: O(1) - The solution uses constant extra space (excluding the output array).
    • Problem 3: O(1) - The solution uses constant extra space (excluding the output array).
  4. Code Quality:

    • The code is generally well-structured and readable. However, there are a few areas for improvement:
      • The comments could be more descriptive, especially explaining the logic behind the two-pass approach in Problem 1 and the direction changes in Problem 2.
      • The variable names are clear, but some could be more descriptive (e.g., rp in Problem 1 could be running_product).
      • The type hints are present but marked with # type: ignore, which could be avoided by properly importing List from typing.
  5. Efficiency:

    • The solutions are already efficient, but minor optimizations could include:
      • In Problem 1, initializing the result array with [1] * n instead of a list comprehension for brevity.
      • In Problem 3, the repeated checks for top <= bottom and left <= right could be streamlined, though the current approach is clear and correct.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants