Skip to content

Conversation

Mirodin
Copy link

@Mirodin Mirodin commented Dec 20, 2023

Adding MQTT auto discovery: #1315

Some keys were renamed/dropped from the initial proposal arendst/Tasmota#9267:

{
  "bd":"8.4.0.2",                                   // Tasmota SW build version - now sw
  "bt":[0,0,0,0],                                   // Buttons, 0: disabled: 1: enabled - now btn
  "id":"49A3BC",                                    // ChipID
  "li":[0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0],                           // Lights, 0: disabled, 1: Enabled
  "of":"Offline",                                   // D_OFFLINE - now ofln
  "on":"Online",                                    // D_ONLINE - now onln
  "se":[0],                                         // Sensors, 0: disabled, 0..xx index in kHAssJsonSensorTypes (??)
  "st":["OFF","ON","TOGGLE","HOLD"],                // StateText[0..3] - now state
  "sw":[0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0],                           // Switches, 0: disabled: 1: enabled - now swc?
}

I also stumbled upon some keys that were not in the proposal but could not figure out what they are:

{
  "bat":0,                                         // battery?
  "dslp":0,
  "if":0,
  "lk":0,
  "ty":0,
  "sho":[],
  "sht":[]
  "swc":[-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1],                 // I suppose this was sw, but why -1?
  "swn":[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null],
}

@stefanbode
Copy link
Collaborator

{
"bat":0, // is the device battery driven and provide % of remainign power?
"dslp":0, // is the device deep_speep configured, will change online/offline behavior in HA. device ia expected to sleep most of the time
"if":0,
"lk":0,
"ty":0,
"sho":[], // configured shutteroptions, reverse, locked,.... works with HA
"sht":[] // configured shutters. Works with HA for shutters and blinds
"swc":[-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1], // I suppose this was sw, but why -1?
"swn":[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null],
}

@Mirodin
Copy link
Author

Mirodin commented Dec 21, 2023

Thank you for chiming in and also for confirming my assumption about "bat".
I wonder if it is considered rude to ping the participants from the feature request to help out with the remaining properties? Maybe they know about additional ones that I do not have on my devices?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants