Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FABRIC] ASYNC_WR_ATOMIC_INC #17072

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 28, 2025
Merged

[FABRIC] ASYNC_WR_ATOMIC_INC #17072

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 28, 2025

Conversation

aagarwalTT
Copy link
Contributor

@aagarwalTT aagarwalTT commented Jan 24, 2025

Ticket

Link to Github Issue

Problem description

Currently tt-fabric supports two individual commands, AsyncWrite and AtomicIncrements.

We need to implement a compound command that combines the two in one packet.

What's changed

Added support for new command, updated tests, added tests to CI

Checklist

  • Post commit CI passes
  • Blackhole Post commit (if applicable)
  • Model regression CI testing passes (if applicable)
  • Device performance regression CI testing passes (if applicable)
  • (For models and ops writers) Full new models tests passes
  • New/Existing tests provide coverage for changes

Sorry, something went wrong.

@aagarwalTT aagarwalTT force-pushed the aagarwal/async-wr-atomic-inc branch from 178a802 to d41be5e Compare January 27, 2025 19:16
return test_buffer_handler_async_wr();
} else if constexpr (test_command == ATOMIC_INC) {
return test_buffer_handler_atomic_inc();
} else if constexpr (test_command == ASYNC_WR_RESP) {
return test_buffer_handler_fvcc();
}

return true;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FYI, I fixed this for main to return false, you will see a rebase conflict here.

@ubcheema
Copy link
Contributor

looks good.

@aagarwalTT aagarwalTT force-pushed the aagarwal/async-wr-atomic-inc branch from d41be5e to 124680c Compare January 28, 2025 01:36
@aagarwalTT aagarwalTT force-pushed the aagarwal/async-wr-atomic-inc branch from 124680c to 1b33015 Compare January 28, 2025 01:39
@aagarwalTT aagarwalTT marked this pull request as ready for review January 28, 2025 01:39
@aagarwalTT aagarwalTT requested a review from a team as a code owner January 28, 2025 01:39
@aagarwalTT aagarwalTT merged commit bb09146 into main Jan 28, 2025
10 checks passed
@aagarwalTT aagarwalTT deleted the aagarwal/async-wr-atomic-inc branch January 28, 2025 17:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants