Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(suite): missing fee label in send modal #16890

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

adamhavel
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@adamhavel adamhavel linked an issue Feb 7, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@adamhavel adamhavel self-assigned this Feb 7, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the TransactionReviewOutput component by modifying the labels used in the output lines generated by the getOutputLines function. A new label with the translation ID "AMOUNT" is now applied for outputs of types 'gas' and 'fee'. In addition, for the 'fee-replace' type, the label for the increased fee is updated to "TR_INCREASE_FEE_BY", while the label for the increased fee value remains as "TR_INCREASED_FEE". The logic and control flow of the function remain unchanged, and the structure of the output lines is maintained. The component’s properties, defined by TransactionReviewOutputProps, have also been updated to include new structure details relevant to these label changes.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • tomasklim
  • MiroslavProchazka
  • Lemonexe
  • jvaclavik

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f0ae958 and 50e4944.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/suite/src/components/suite/modals/ReduxModal/TransactionReviewModal/TransactionReviewOutputList/TransactionReviewOutput.tsx (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (8)
  • GitHub Check: run-desktop-tests (@group=wallet, trezor-user-env-unix bitcoin-regtest)
  • GitHub Check: run-desktop-tests (@group=other, trezor-user-env-unix)
  • GitHub Check: run-desktop-tests (@group=settings, trezor-user-env-unix bitcoin-regtest)
  • GitHub Check: build-web
  • GitHub Check: Analyze with CodeQL (javascript)
  • GitHub Check: run-desktop-tests (@group=suite, trezor-user-env-unix)
  • GitHub Check: Setup and Cache Dependencies
  • GitHub Check: build-web
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/suite/src/components/suite/modals/ReduxModal/TransactionReviewModal/TransactionReviewOutputList/TransactionReviewOutput.tsx (1)

115-123: LGTM! Improved UI consistency.

The addition of the "AMOUNT" label for 'gas' and 'fee' types aligns with the existing label used for the 'amount' type output, making the UI more consistent.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@adamhavel adamhavel requested a review from jvaclavik February 7, 2025 14:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: 🔎 Needs review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

No amount in Send dialogue when using T1B1 model
1 participant