Skip to content

Improved realtime sharding strategy #2229

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 3, 2025
Merged

Conversation

ericallam
Copy link
Member

When sharding, use the where clause in the shard key to distribute requests more evenly

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jul 3, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 7b0c0ca

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 3, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update the method signature and logic of #resolveElectricOrigin in the RealtimeClient class to accept a URL, a whereClause string, and an environmentId, and to use a new sharding approach based on a composite shard key derived from the whereClause and environmentId. A helper method #getShardKey was added for shard key generation. The Docker Compose configuration is updated to use a newer version of the electricsql/electric image and introduces a new service, electric-shard-1, configured for sharding with a unique replication stream ID and a separate port.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/webapp/app/services/realtimeClient.server.ts (1)

508-510: Consider adding validation for shard key components.

The shard key generation is straightforward, but consider adding validation to ensure the components don't contain unexpected characters that could affect the hash distribution.

Consider this enhancement for better robustness:

 #getShardKey(whereClause: string, environmentId: string) {
+  // Validate inputs to ensure consistent hashing
+  if (!whereClause || !environmentId) {
+    throw new Error("Invalid shard key components: whereClause and environmentId are required");
+  }
   return [environmentId, whereClause].join(":");
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b7134dd and 7b0c0ca.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/webapp/app/services/realtimeClient.server.ts (2 hunks)
  • docker/docker-compose.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
`apps/webapp/**/*.ts`: In the webapp, all environment variables must be accessed through the `env` export of `env.server.ts`, instead of directly accessing `process.env`.

apps/webapp/**/*.ts: In the webapp, all environment variables must be accessed through the env export of env.server.ts, instead of directly accessing process.env.

📄 Source: CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.cursor/rules/webapp.mdc)

List of files the instruction was applied to:

  • apps/webapp/app/services/realtimeClient.server.ts
`apps/webapp/**/*.{ts,tsx}`: When importing from `@trigger.dev/core` in the weba...

apps/webapp/**/*.{ts,tsx}: When importing from @trigger.dev/core in the webapp, never import from the root @trigger.dev/core path; always use one of the subpath exports as defined in the package's package.json.

📄 Source: CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.cursor/rules/webapp.mdc)

List of files the instruction was applied to:

  • apps/webapp/app/services/realtimeClient.server.ts
`**/*.{ts,tsx}`: Always prefer using isomorphic code like fetch, ReadableStream,...

**/*.{ts,tsx}: Always prefer using isomorphic code like fetch, ReadableStream, etc. instead of Node.js specific code
For TypeScript, we usually use types over interfaces
Avoid enums
Use strict mode
No default exports, use function declarations

📄 Source: CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)

List of files the instruction was applied to:

  • apps/webapp/app/services/realtimeClient.server.ts
`{packages/core,apps/webapp}/**/*.{ts,tsx}`: We use zod a lot in packages/core and in the webapp

{packages/core,apps/webapp}/**/*.{ts,tsx}: We use zod a lot in packages/core and in the webapp

📄 Source: CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)

List of files the instruction was applied to:

  • apps/webapp/app/services/realtimeClient.server.ts
🧠 Learnings (1)
apps/webapp/app/services/realtimeClient.server.ts (1)
Learnt from: CR
PR: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#0
File: .cursor/rules/webapp.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-30T13:21:59.413Z
Learning: Applies to apps/webapp/**/*.ts : In the webapp, all environment variables must be accessed through the `env` export of `env.server.ts`, instead of directly accessing `process.env`.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (25)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (4, 8)
  • GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (10, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (5, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (5, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (8, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (6, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (6, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (7, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (3, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (2, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (8, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (7, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (4, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (1, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (2, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / packages / 🧪 Unit Tests: Packages (1, 1)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (9, 10)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (3, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (1, 8)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/webapp/app/services/realtimeClient.server.ts (1)

295-295: LGTM: Method call updated correctly for new sharding strategy.

The method call has been properly updated to pass the new parameters required by the enhanced sharding logic.

docker/docker-compose.yml (2)

63-77: LGTM: New shard service configuration is properly implemented.

The new electric-shard-1 service is correctly configured with:

  • Unique container name and replication stream ID
  • Different port (3061 vs 3060) to avoid conflicts
  • Consistent environment variables and network configuration
  • Proper dependency on the database service

This aligns well with the sharding logic implemented in the TypeScript code.


51-51: No breaking changes in ElectricSQL 1.0.22 – safe to upgrade

Upgrading from 1.0.13 to 1.0.22 introduces only stability fixes, performance improvements, and clearer error handling; there are no backwards-incompatible changes in these minor/patch releases. You can proceed with the in-place upgrade without modifying the code or data model.

@ericallam ericallam merged commit 7bb7e7a into main Jul 3, 2025
33 checks passed
@ericallam ericallam deleted the realtime-eletric-shard-strategy branch July 3, 2025 13:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants