Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update/streamline rocc-acc-utils #1671

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

abejgonzalez
Copy link
Contributor

Updated RoCC Acc. Utils library for various new features/QoL improvements:

  • MemLoader/Writer re-written to support arb. bus widths, queues/logic to shift/rotate bytes into proper stream are now simpler and use new StreamShifter module (allows for single large queue instead of multiple small byte queues).
  • Various print improvements in the codebase
  • Small IO re-naming (additionally, removed all references to "compress" "serialize" etc from past accelerators)
  • Caliptra AES block is updated with the changes

Related PRs / Issues:

Type of change:

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Other enhancement

Impact:

  • RTL change
  • Software change (RISC-V software)
  • Build system change
  • Other

Contributor Checklist:

  • Did you set main as the base branch?
  • Is this PR's title suitable for inclusion in the changelog and have you added a changelog:<topic> label?
  • Did you state the type-of-change/impact?
  • Did you delete any extraneous prints/debugging code?
  • Did you mark the PR with a changelog: label?
  • (If applicable) Did you update the conda .conda-lock.yml file if you updated the conda requirements file?
  • (If applicable) Did you add documentation for the feature?
  • (If applicable) Did you add a test demonstrating the PR?
  • (If applicable) Did you mark the PR as Please Backport?

@abejgonzalez
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tested with the AES ECB 256 test.

@jerryz123 jerryz123 deleted the updated-rocc-acc-utils branch January 21, 2024 00:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant