Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UX Enhancements #160

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
May 4, 2024
Merged

UX Enhancements #160

merged 13 commits into from
May 4, 2024

Conversation

@fdodino fdodino requested review from ivojawer and PalumboN May 1, 2024 02:41
@fdodino fdodino marked this pull request as ready for review May 1, 2024 02:42
@fdodino
Copy link
Contributor Author

fdodino commented May 1, 2024

@PalumboN @ivojawer ésto ya estaría, falta mergear los PRs que están dando vuelta en wollok-ts y releasear para que el CI pase.

Copy link
Contributor

@ivojawer ivojawer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hermoso PR!! Me gusta como quedaron los errores ❣️

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Por si te complicaba la def de este archivo, por las dudas dejo link a la version en svg de este icono: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1h_GfnEt2FdGlOD7U_b-mNBr8eBhfiM_8?usp=drive_link

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 3, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.71429% with 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 83.44%. Comparing base (df35b09) to head (11e985c).

Files Patch % Lines
client/src/extension.ts 33.33% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #160      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.21%   83.44%   +0.23%     
==========================================
  Files          17       17              
  Lines         429      435       +6     
  Branches      100       97       -3     
==========================================
+ Hits          357      363       +6     
  Misses         72       72              
Flag Coverage Δ
lsp-ide-client 93.28% <75.00%> (-0.66%) ⬇️
lsp-ide-server 79.06% <100.00%> (+0.61%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@fdodino
Copy link
Contributor Author

fdodino commented May 3, 2024

Uf, @PalumboN @ivojawer hoy terminé de cerrar el PR, pero me encontré con un error en los tests de hover, hay dos atributos undefined nuevos.
Le metí un hack para eliminar esos atributos vacíos:

async function testHover(uri: Uri, position: Position, expected: any): Promise<void> {
  await activate(uri)
  const actual = await commands.executeCommand('vscode.executeHoverProvider', uri, position)
//
  delete actual[0]['canDecreaseHover']
  delete actual[0]['canIncreaseHover']
//
  assert.deepEqual(actual, [expected])

El error que tira el CI también me lo daba en mi máquina.

Copy link
Contributor

@PalumboN PalumboN left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

GROSO Dodaiiiiinnnnnn!!! Siempre mejorando todo a su paso 🌱 🚶 🌹 🔆

server/src/linter.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
server/src/server.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
server/src/functionalities/definition.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
@PalumboN
Copy link
Contributor

PalumboN commented May 4, 2024

Uf, @PalumboN @ivojawer hoy terminé de cerrar el PR, pero me encontré con un error en los tests de hover, hay dos atributos undefined nuevos.

Esto fue porque actualizamos alguna versión de algo o qué onda? El hover igual sigue andando bien, no?

@fdodino
Copy link
Contributor Author

fdodino commented May 4, 2024

Uf, @PalumboN @ivojawer hoy terminé de cerrar el PR, pero me encontré con un error en los tests de hover, hay dos atributos undefined nuevos.

Esto fue porque actualizamos alguna versión de algo o qué onda? El hover igual sigue andando bien, no?

woww!! nunca había visto funcionando el hover, es el debugger del AST en runtime! Sí , funciona ok.

@fdodino fdodino merged commit dfec6ed into master May 4, 2024
6 checks passed
@fdodino fdodino deleted the ux-enhancements branch May 4, 2024 22:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants