refactor: remove live session tables and simplify test suite logic #4380
Conversation
Current Aviator status
This pull request is currently open (not queued). How to mergeTo merge this PR, comment
See the real-time status of this PR on the
Aviator webapp.
Use the Aviator Chrome Extension
to see the status of your PR within GitHub.
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request introduces comprehensive changes across multiple services and schema definitions, focusing on removing legacy migration-related code, refining entity management, and streamlining data structures. The modifications primarily involve removing Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
sjschlapbach
changed the title
sjschlapbach
added
the
blocked
klicker-uzh
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
klicker-uzh
|
| Branch Review |
remove-live-session
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 13m 54s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Julius Schlapbach |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
0
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
194
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations/20241202073643_rename_status_enums/migration.sql (1)
15-15: Correct the comment to match the operation performedThe comment on line 14 states:
-- Rename status column to statusNEW on GroupActivity tableHowever, the actual operation is renaming
statusNEWtostatus. Update the comment for clarity:-- Rename statusNEW column to status on GroupActivity table
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (22)
apps/backend-docker/src/app.ts(1 hunks)cypress/cypress/e2e/F-live-quiz-workflow.cy.ts(2 hunks)cypress/cypress/support/commands.ts(4 hunks)packages/graphql/src/services/accounts.ts(0 hunks)packages/graphql/src/services/groups.ts(0 hunks)packages/graphql/src/services/liveQuizzes.ts(0 hunks)packages/graphql/src/services/microLearning.ts(0 hunks)packages/graphql/src/services/practiceQuizzes.ts(0 hunks)packages/graphql/src/services/questions.ts(0 hunks)packages/graphql/src/services/stacks.ts(4 hunks)packages/prisma/src/data/helpers.ts(0 hunks)packages/prisma/src/data/seedFlashcards.ts(0 hunks)packages/prisma/src/data/seedTEST.ts(0 hunks)packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations/20241202072541_remove_live_session/migration.sql(1 hunks)packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations/20241202073643_rename_status_enums/migration.sql(1 hunks)packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/course.prisma(0 hunks)packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/element.prisma(1 hunks)packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/gamification.prisma(0 hunks)packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/participant.prisma(0 hunks)packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/quiz.prisma(3 hunks)packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/response.prisma(2 hunks)packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/user.prisma(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (12)
- packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/course.prisma
- packages/prisma/src/data/seedFlashcards.ts
- packages/graphql/src/services/questions.ts
- packages/graphql/src/services/practiceQuizzes.ts
- packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/participant.prisma
- packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/gamification.prisma
- packages/prisma/src/data/helpers.ts
- packages/graphql/src/services/liveQuizzes.ts
- packages/graphql/src/services/microLearning.ts
- packages/graphql/src/services/groups.ts
- packages/prisma/src/data/seedTEST.ts
- packages/graphql/src/services/accounts.ts
🔇 Additional comments (10)
cypress/cypress/e2e/F-live-quiz-workflow.cy.ts (1)
618-623: Verify if adding duplicate questions to blocks is intentional.
In the cy.createBlocks call, the same question is added twice to the same block:
{ questions: [questionTitle1, questionTitle1] },
{ questions: [questionTitle2, questionTitle2] },Please confirm whether this duplication is intentional, as it may cause the same question to appear multiple times in the quiz, which could confuse users.
packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/element.prisma (1)
147-148: LGTM
The type field in the ElementStack model is correctly defined as ElementStackType. This aligns with the consolidation of type definitions and ensures consistency within the model.
packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/quiz.prisma (3)
310-311:
Ensure no NULL values before altering liveQuizId to NOT NULL
The liveQuizId field in the ConfusionTimestep model is being changed to be non-nullable. Verify that there are no existing ConfusionTimestep records with liveQuizId set to NULL, as this will cause the migration to fail.
Run the following script to confirm there are no NULL values:
✅ Verification successful
Migration is safe - liveQuizId was already required
Based on the migration history found in the output, this change is safe. The field was already made non-nullable in a previous migration as evidenced by:
-- Made the column `liveQuizId` on table `ConfusionTimestep` required. This step will fail if there are existing NULL values in that column.
ALTER TABLE "ConfusionTimestep" DROP COLUMN "sessionId",
ALTER COLUMN "liveQuizId" SET NOT NULL;The current schema change is just reflecting the existing database state in the Prisma schema, not actually modifying the database constraint.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for NULL values in `liveQuizId` in the `ConfusionTimestep` table.
rg 'liveQuizId[\s]*=[\s]*null' -t sql
Length of output: 39
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the schema history and migrations to understand if liveQuizId was nullable before
fd -e sql . prisma/migrations --exec cat {} | rg -i "confusion.*live.*quiz|live.*quiz.*confusion" -B2 -A2
# Also check the schema definition history
fd schema.prisma . --exec cat {} | rg "ConfusionTimestep.*{|liveQuiz" -B2 -A2
Length of output: 428
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the schema history and migrations with corrected paths and patterns
fd -e prisma . | xargs cat | rg "ConfusionTimestep|liveQuiz" -B2 -A2
# Also search for any migration files
fd -e sql . | xargs cat | rg -i "confusion.*timestep|live.*quiz" -B2 -A2
Length of output: 10480
201-201: Verify updates to status enums across the codebase
The status field in the GroupActivity model has been changed to use PublicationStatus instead of GroupActivityStatus. Ensure that all references to GroupActivityStatus have been updated accordingly to prevent any runtime errors or inconsistencies.
Run the following script to check for any remaining references to GroupActivityStatus:
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the migration script to understand if this is a planned migration of the enum. Let me verify the content of the migration script.
Let me verify if there are any remaining references to GroupActivityStatus in the codebase that are not part of migrations or the migration script.
Let me modify the search command to handle the file types correctly.
Let me try one final search without file type filters.
Migration from GroupActivityStatus to PublicationStatus is properly handled
Based on the evidence from the migration files and migration script:
- A dedicated migration script (
2024-11-07_migrate_unified_enums.ts) handles the data migration fromGroupActivityStatustoPublicationStatus - The schema migration (
20241202073643_rename_status_enums) properly handles the schema changes - No other references to
GroupActivityStatusexist in the codebase outside of these migration files
The change is safe as all necessary migration steps are in place and there are no lingering references to the old enum.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find usages of the old `GroupActivityStatus` enum.
rg --fixed-strings 'GroupActivityStatus'
Length of output: 1571
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the migration script that renames the status enums
cat packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations/20241202073643_rename_status_enums/migration.sql
# Also check the unified enum migration script
cat packages/graphql/src/scripts/2024-11-07_migrate_unified_enums.ts
Length of output: 3419
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find any remaining references to GroupActivityStatus excluding migration files and the migration script
rg --fixed-strings 'GroupActivityStatus' \
--type ts \
--type tsx \
--type js \
--type jsx \
--glob '!**/migrations/**' \
--glob '!**/2024-11-07_migrate_unified_enums.ts'
Length of output: 186
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find any remaining references to GroupActivityStatus excluding migration files and the migration script
rg --fixed-strings 'GroupActivityStatus' \
--type typescript \
--type javascriptreact \
--type javascript \
--type typescriptreact \
--glob '!**/migrations/**' \
--glob '!**/2024-11-07_migrate_unified_enums.ts'
Length of output: 233
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find any remaining references to GroupActivityStatus excluding migration files and the migration script
rg --fixed-strings 'GroupActivityStatus' \
--glob '!**/migrations/**' \
--glob '!**/2024-11-07_migrate_unified_enums.ts'
Length of output: 116
280-281:
Ensure no NULL values before altering liveQuizId to NOT NULL
The liveQuizId field in the Feedback model is being changed to be non-nullable. Verify that there are no existing Feedback records with liveQuizId set to NULL, as this will cause the migration to fail.
Run the following script to confirm there are no NULL values:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the migration history and schema analysis, I can now generate the final response:
Migration from sessionId to liveQuizId is handled safely
The migration history shows that this change is part of a larger refactoring from LiveSession to LiveQuiz. The migration (20241202072541_remove_live_session) properly handles the transition by:
- First adding
liveQuizIdas a nullable field (in 20240119171242_element_structure_and_unique) - Then dropping the old
sessionIdand makingliveQuizIdrequired (in 20241202072541_remove_live_session)
This two-step migration pattern ensures data consistency, as it allows for data migration between the steps. The warning in the migration about NULL values is standard for such changes and doesn't indicate an actual issue.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for NULL values in `liveQuizId` in the `Feedback` table.
rg 'liveQuizId[\s]*=[\s]*null' -t sql
Length of output: 39
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the schema history and migrations to understand if liveQuizId was nullable before
fd 'migration.sql' --exec cat {} \;
# Also check the schema file to understand the current state
cat packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/quiz.prisma
Length of output: 65948
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any existing migrations that make liveQuizId nullable
rg "ALTER TABLE.*Feedback.*liveQuizId.*NULL" -A 5 -B 5
# Also check if there are any migrations that add the liveQuizId column
rg "ADD COLUMN.*liveQuizId.*Feedback" -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 106
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the migration history for any changes to the Feedback table
rg "Feedback" -A 10 -B 10 --type sql
# Also check the current schema definition for the Feedback table
rg "model Feedback \{" -A 20 -B 5 packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/quiz.prisma
Length of output: 31971
packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/user.prisma (1)
98-98: LGTM
The session field in the User model is correctly defined as an array of Session objects. This ensures consistent relationships and aligns with the standard Prisma modeling practices.
packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations/20241202072541_remove_live_session/migration.sql (1)
1-13:
Critical: Confirm data backup and migration plan due to potential data loss
The migration script drops several columns and tables, which will result in data loss:
- Columns being dropped:
sessionIdfromConfusionTimestep,Feedback,LeaderboardEntrymigrationIdfromElementInstance
- Tables being dropped:
LiveSessionQuestionInstanceSessionBlock
Additionally, making liveQuizId non-nullable in ConfusionTimestep and Feedback may cause the migration to fail if NULL values exist.
Please ensure that:
- All important data from the dropped columns and tables have been correctly migrated or are no longer needed.
- There are no
NULLvalues in theliveQuizIdcolumns of theConfusionTimestepandFeedbacktables.
Consider running data validation scripts or migrating data before executing this migration.
packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/response.prisma (1)
15-15: Verify handling of time metrics after default value removal
The removal of @default(0) from averageTimeSpent and timeSpent fields requires that these values be explicitly set during record creation. While the changes in stacks.ts handle this appropriately, we should verify that all code paths properly initialize these fields.
Also applies to: 82-82
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the search results to verify the handling of time metrics after the default value removal.
Looking at the results, I can see that:
- For QuestionResponseDetail creation:
- In
packages/graphql/src/services/stacks.ts, allcreateoperations explicitly set thetimeSpentfield:await prisma.questionResponseDetail.create({ data: { // ...other fields timeSpent: answerTime, } })
- For QuestionResponse:
- The
upsertoperations inpackages/graphql/src/services/stacks.tsare the primary creation points - Let me verify the create data in these upsert operations
Time metrics are properly handled after default value removal
The verification shows that all creation paths properly initialize the time fields:
- QuestionResponseDetail's
timeSpentis explicitly set in all create operations:
timeSpent: answerTime- QuestionResponse's
averageTimeSpentis explicitly set in all upsert operations:
averageTimeSpent: newAverageResponseTime ?? 0The removal of default values is safe as the codebase consistently provides these values during record creation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all locations where QuestionResponse and QuestionResponseDetail are created/updated
# to ensure proper handling of time fields
# Search for QuestionResponse creation/updates
echo "Searching for QuestionResponse creation/updates..."
rg -A 5 "prisma\.(questionResponse|QuestionResponse)\.(create|update|upsert)"
# Search for QuestionResponseDetail creation/updates
echo "Searching for QuestionResponseDetail creation/updates..."
rg -A 5 "prisma\.(questionResponseDetail|QuestionResponseDetail)\.(create|update|upsert)"
Length of output: 16304
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get more context around the upsert operations in stacks.ts
rg -A 15 "prisma\.questionResponse\.upsert" packages/graphql/src/services/stacks.ts
Length of output: 1414
apps/backend-docker/src/app.ts (1)
115-115: LGTM: Documentation update reflects architectural changes
The comment update from QuestionInstance to ElementInstance aligns with the broader architectural changes in the codebase.
packages/graphql/src/services/stacks.ts (1)
564-564: LGTM: Consistent handling of time metrics across response types
The changes properly handle the removal of default values from the schema by explicitly setting averageTimeSpent to 0 when newAverageResponseTime is undefined. The implementation is consistent across all response types (flashcard, content, and question responses).
Also applies to: 910-910, 1915-1915, 1941-1941
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
cypress/cypress/support/commands.ts (1)
565-588: Consider adding error handling for drag-and-drop operations.While the implementation is solid, it could benefit from error handling for failed drag-and-drop operations.
Consider wrapping the drag-and-drop operations in a try-catch block:
function createBlocks({ blocks }: { blocks: BlockType[] }) { if (!blocks || blocks.length === 0) { throw new Error('No blocks provided.') } blocks.forEach((block, blockIndex) => { if (blockIndex > 0) { cy.get('[data-cy="drop-elements-add-stack"]').click() } block.questions.forEach((element, questionIndex) => { + try { const dataTransfer = new DataTransfer() cy.get(`[data-cy="question-item-${element}"]`) .contains(element) .trigger('dragstart', { dataTransfer, }) cy.get(`[data-cy="drop-elements-block-${blockIndex}"]`).trigger('drop', { dataTransfer, }) cy.get(`[data-cy="question-${questionIndex}-stack-${blockIndex}"]`).contains( element.substring(0, 20) ) + } catch (error) { + cy.log(`Failed to add question ${element} to block ${blockIndex}`) + throw error + } }) }) }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
cypress/cypress/support/commands.ts(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
cypress/cypress/support/commands.ts (3)
561-563: LGTM: Clean and focused interface definition.
The BlockType interface is well-defined with a clear purpose.
486-486: LGTM: Good refactoring to extract block creation logic.
The changes improve code organization by moving block creation to a dedicated function.
Also applies to: 514-514
852-852: LGTM: Proper type declaration for the new command.
The type declaration is correctly added to the Cypress namespace.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/element.prisma (2)
177-178: Consider adding validation for timeLimit fieldWhile the basic structure is sound, consider adding validation constraints for the
timeLimitfield to ensure it cannot be negative or exceed reasonable bounds.id Int @id @default(autoincrement()) order Int - timeLimit Int? + /// @ValidateMin(0) + /// @ValidateMax(7200) // 2 hours in seconds + timeLimit Int?
Line range hint
1-266: Schema refactoring aligns well with architectural goalsThe schema changes effectively support the PR objectives by:
- Simplifying the data model through removal of legacy fields
- Consolidating type systems (e.g., ElementStackType)
- Maintaining proper relationships and constraints
Consider documenting these architectural changes in the project's technical documentation to help other developers understand the new schema structure.
cypress/cypress/support/commands.ts (1)
565-588: Consider enhancing error handling and type safety.The implementation is solid with good validation and consistent naming. Consider these improvements:
- Add validation for empty questions array
- Add type guard for DataTransfer support
- Consider handling drag-and-drop operation failures
function createBlocks({ blocks }: { blocks: BlockType[] }) { if (!blocks || blocks.length === 0) { throw new Error('No blocks provided.') } + // Validate that each block has questions + blocks.forEach((block, index) => { + if (!block.questions || block.questions.length === 0) { + throw new Error(`Block at index ${index} has no questions.`) + } + }) + + // Type guard for DataTransfer support + if (typeof DataTransfer === 'undefined') { + throw new Error('DataTransfer is not supported in this environment.') + } + blocks.forEach((block, blockIndex) => { if (blockIndex > 0) { cy.get('[data-cy="drop-elements-add-stack"]').click() } block.questions.forEach((element, questionIndex) => { const dataTransfer = new DataTransfer() cy.get(`[data-cy="question-item-${element}"]`) .contains(element) .trigger('dragstart', { dataTransfer, }) cy.get(`[data-cy="drop-elements-block-${blockIndex}"]`) .trigger('drop', { dataTransfer, + }) + .should('exist') // Verify drop operation succeeded }) cy.get( `[data-cy="question-${questionIndex}-stack-${blockIndex}"]` ).contains(element.substring(0, 20)) }) }) }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
cypress/cypress/support/commands.ts(4 hunks)packages/graphql/src/services/questions.ts(0 hunks)packages/prisma/src/data/seedFlashcards.ts(0 hunks)packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations/20241202084602_drop_unused_original_ids/migration.sql(1 hunks)packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/element.prisma(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- packages/prisma/src/data/seedFlashcards.ts
- packages/graphql/src/services/questions.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations/20241202084602_drop_unused_original_ids/migration.sql
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/element.prisma (1)
144-145: Verify completion of ElementStackType migration
The removal of the typeNEW field suggests a schema migration. Please ensure that:
- All existing records have been migrated from the old type system
- The status migration script mentioned in the PR description has been executed
✅ Verification successful
Migration for ElementStackType has been completed successfully
Based on the evidence from the codebase:
- The migration was properly executed through
20241202073643_rename_status_enums/migration.sqlwhich:- Dropped the old
ElementStackType - Renamed
ElementStackTypeNewtoElementStackType
- Dropped the old
- All references to
typeNEWandElementStackTypeNewhave been removed from the schema - The codebase consistently uses the new
ElementStackTypeenum - Migration scripts (
2024-02-*) have been executed to handle the data migration
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to old type system
# Check for references to typeNEW or ElementStackTypeNew
rg -i "typeNEW|ElementStackTypeNew" --type prisma --type typescript
# Check for migration files related to ElementStackType
fd -e sql -e ts ".*stack.*type.*"
Length of output: 136
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search approach
# Search for any references to ElementStackType in the codebase
rg "ElementStackType"
# Look for migration files in common migration directories
fd -e sql -e ts . "packages/prisma/src/migrations"
# Check for any migration-related TypeScript files
fd -e ts . "packages/prisma/src" -x grep -l "ElementStackType" {} \;
Length of output: 30761
cypress/cypress/support/commands.ts (3)
486-486: LGTM: Interface changes are well-structured.
The BlockType interface is appropriately defined and the integration with CreateLiveQuizArgs is clean.
Also applies to: 561-563
589-589: LGTM: Command registration is properly implemented.
The createBlocks command is correctly registered and typed in the Chainable interface.
Also applies to: 852-852
514-514: Verify test suite compatibility with the new blocks parameter.
Ensure all existing tests using createLiveQuiz have been updated to use the new blocks parameter structure.
✅ Verification successful
No compatibility issues found with the test suite
The test suite is already compatible with the new blocks parameter structure. The createLiveQuiz command properly uses createBlocks internally, and all test files (C-control-workflow.cy.ts and E-course-workflow.cy.ts) are passing the required blocks parameter in their createLiveQuiz calls. The implementation in commands.ts shows the correct integration between these commands.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all test files using createLiveQuiz to verify they've been updated
# Search for createLiveQuiz usage in test files
echo "Searching for createLiveQuiz usage in test files..."
rg -l "cy\.createLiveQuiz" --type ts
# Search for specific patterns that might indicate outdated usage
echo "Checking for potential outdated usage patterns..."
rg "createLiveQuiz\(\{[^}]*\}\)" --type ts -A 5
Length of output: 399
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual usage in the identified files
echo "Checking C-control-workflow.cy.ts:"
rg "createLiveQuiz" cypress/cypress/e2e/C-control-workflow.cy.ts -B 2 -A 2
echo -e "\nChecking E-course-workflow.cy.ts:"
rg "createLiveQuiz" cypress/cypress/e2e/E-course-workflow.cy.ts -B 2 -A 2
# Let's also check for createBlocks usage to understand the new pattern
echo -e "\nChecking createBlocks usage:"
rg "createBlocks" cypress/cypress/e2e/ -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 1471
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of createLiveQuiz and createBlocks in commands.ts
echo "Checking createLiveQuiz implementation:"
rg "createLiveQuiz" cypress/cypress/support/commands.ts -B 5 -A 15
echo -e "\nChecking createBlocks implementation and its relationship with createLiveQuiz:"
rg "createBlocks" cypress/cypress/support/commands.ts -B 5 -A 15
Length of output: 3924
|
TODO: regenerate clean and separate migrations? or check function with new prisma 6.1.0 |
…e-live-session
…er-uzh into remove-live-session
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/element.prisma (1)
Line range hint
1-266: Consider consistent cleanup of originalId fieldsSeveral models still retain
originalIdfields and their associated unique constraints:
Elementmodel:originalId String?with@@unique([ownerId, originalId])MediaFilemodel:originalId String?with@@unique([ownerId, originalId])For consistency in schema cleanup, consider whether these
originalIdfields should also be removed, similar to the removal from theTagmodel mentioned in the AI summary.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json(0 hunks)packages/graphql/src/ops.ts(0 hunks)packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql(0 hunks)packages/graphql/src/services/accounts.ts(0 hunks)packages/graphql/src/services/liveQuizzes.ts(0 hunks)packages/graphql/src/services/microLearning.ts(0 hunks)packages/graphql/src/services/practiceQuizzes.ts(0 hunks)packages/graphql/src/services/stacks.ts(3 hunks)packages/i18n/messages/de.ts(0 hunks)packages/i18n/messages/en.ts(0 hunks)packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/course.prisma(0 hunks)packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/element.prisma(2 hunks)packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/participant.prisma(0 hunks)packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/quiz.prisma(3 hunks)packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/user.prisma(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (11)
- packages/graphql/src/ops.ts
- packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/course.prisma
- packages/graphql/src/services/practiceQuizzes.ts
- packages/i18n/messages/de.ts
- packages/i18n/messages/en.ts
- packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/participant.prisma
- packages/graphql/src/services/liveQuizzes.ts
- packages/graphql/src/services/microLearning.ts
- packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql
- packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json
- packages/graphql/src/services/accounts.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/user.prisma
- packages/graphql/src/services/stacks.ts
🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/quiz.prisma (4)
286-287:
Breaking Change: Feedback.liveQuizId is now required
The relationship between Feedback and LiveQuiz is now required instead of optional. This is a breaking change that needs careful migration handling.
316-317:
Breaking Change: ConfusionTimestep.liveQuizId is now required
The relationship between ConfusionTimestep and LiveQuiz is now required instead of optional. This is a breaking change that needs careful migration handling.
✅ Verification successful
Migration is properly handling the breaking change
The migration file 20241202072541_remove_live_session shows that this change is part of a larger refactoring to remove the LiveSession concept. The migration properly:
- Drops the
sessionIdcolumn fromConfusionTimestep - Makes
liveQuizIdrequired withSET NOT NULL - Includes appropriate warning about failing if NULL values exist
- Removes related foreign key constraints
The change is well-structured and the migration will fail safely if there are any NULL values in the liveQuizId column, preventing data loss. This is the expected behavior for such a breaking change.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for existing ConfusionTimestep records that might be affected
# Look for migration files handling the ConfusionTimestep table changes
fd -e sql . packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations | xargs grep -l "ALTER TABLE.*ConfusionTimestep"
# Look for any Prisma schema tests that need updating
fd -e ts -e js . packages/prisma/src/tests | xargs grep -l "ConfusionTimestep"
Length of output: 560
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the migration that handles ConfusionTimestep changes
cat packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations/20241202072541_remove_live_session/migration.sql
# Look for test files in the correct test directory
fd -e ts -e js . packages | xargs grep -l "ConfusionTimestep"
# Look for any code that creates ConfusionTimestep records
rg "createMany|create.*ConfusionTimestep" -A 3
Length of output: 7330
Line range hint 1-324: Architectural Impact: Verify Migration Order and Prisma Compatibility
These schema changes represent a significant architectural shift in how sessions are managed:
- The removal of session tables and transition to direct LiveQuiz relationships requires strict migration order:
- Live quiz migration must be completed in production first
- Status migration script must be executed before these changes
- As mentioned in the PR comments, verify compatibility with Prisma v6.1.0 and consider regenerating clean migrations if needed.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the migration files to verify the migration order and compatibility concerns.
Migration Order and Prisma Compatibility Verified
Based on the analysis of migrations and package versions:
- The Prisma version (v6.1.0) is consistently specified across the project, ensuring compatibility.
- The migration order is correctly structured:
- Session-related tables are dropped in a single migration
- Status enums are properly renamed and migrated
- Element stack types are migrated with proper temporary columns
- No migration dependencies are missing or out of order.
The architectural changes are safe to proceed with as:
- All session-related functionality is cleanly removed
- New status enums are properly introduced before old ones are dropped
- Foreign key constraints are properly handled in the migrations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify migration dependencies and Prisma version
# Check Prisma version in package.json
fd package.json . | xargs grep -l "prisma"
# List all related migrations in order
fd -e sql . packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations | sort
Length of output: 11568
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Prisma version in package.json files
echo "=== Checking Prisma version ==="
fd package.json . -x grep -l "prisma" {} \; -x grep "prisma" {}
# Check recent migrations related to session removal and status changes
echo -e "\n=== Checking recent migrations ==="
fd -e sql . packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations | grep -E "(session|status)" | sort | tail -n 5 | xargs cat
Length of output: 8688
207-207: Verify status mapping in migration script
The status field type change from GroupActivityStatus to PublicationStatus requires careful migration of existing status values. Ensure the status migration script mentioned in the PR objectives handles this mapping correctly.
✅ Verification successful
Status migration is properly handled
The migration chain shows a well-structured transition from GroupActivityStatus to PublicationStatus:
- The original
GroupActivityStatushad onlyDRAFTandPUBLISHEDstates - The migration
20241107142334_live_quiz_blocksadded:- A new
statusNEWcolumn withPublicationStatustype (which includesDRAFT,PUBLISHED,SCHEDULED,ENDED,GRADED) - Set default value to
DRAFT, matching the original default
- A new
- The final migration
20241202073643_rename_status_enums:- Drops the old status column
- Renames
statusNEWtostatus - Drops the old
GroupActivityStatusenum
The migration preserves data integrity and handles the status mapping correctly, with the new PublicationStatus being a superset of the old states.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check migration files for status mapping logic
# Look for migration files that handle the status enum changes
fd -e sql . packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations | xargs grep -l "GroupActivityStatus\|PublicationStatus"
Length of output: 957
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the most recent migration that handles the status enum changes
cat packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations/20241202073643_rename_status_enums/migration.sql
Length of output: 1193
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the previous migration to understand how the new status was prepared
cat packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations/20241107142334_live_quiz_blocks/migration.sql
Length of output: 3782
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check what states were available in the old GroupActivityStatus enum
cat packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations/20230318214109_group_activity_status/migration.sql
Length of output: 289
packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/element.prisma (1)
145-146: Verify the removal of live quiz references
The consolidation of the type field and removal of LIVE_QUIZ from ElementStackType aligns with the PR objective of removing live session tables. However, we should verify that all references to live quizzes have been properly removed from the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Removal of LIVE_QUIZ from ElementStackType is complete
The verification shows that the ElementStackType enum has been successfully updated to only include PRACTICE_QUIZ, MICROLEARNING, and GROUP_ACTIVITY. The LIVE_QUIZ type has been removed and there are no references to typeNEW in the schema, confirming that the consolidation of the type field is complete.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to live quizzes in the codebase
echo "Searching for LIVE_QUIZ references..."
rg -i "live.?quiz" --type ts --type tsx --type prisma
echo "Searching for type migrations using typeNEW..."
rg "typeNEW" --type prisma
Length of output: 329
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to live quizzes in the codebase using more generic file patterns
echo "Searching for LIVE_QUIZ references..."
rg -i "live.?quiz"
echo "Searching for type migrations using typeNEW..."
rg "typeNEW"
# List all enum definitions in Prisma schema files to verify ElementStackType
echo "Checking ElementStackType enum definition..."
fd ".*\.prisma$" --exec cat {} | grep -A 10 "enum ElementStackType"
Length of output: 131070
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check ElementStackType enum definition and any references to typeNEW
echo "Checking ElementStackType enum definition..."
fd ".*\.prisma$" --exec grep -A 10 "enum ElementStackType" {}
echo "Checking for typeNEW references in schema..."
fd ".*\.prisma$" --exec grep -B 2 -A 2 "typeNEW" {}
# Check for any migrations related to ElementStackType
echo "Checking migrations for ElementStackType changes..."
fd ".*\.ts$" --type-add migration:*.ts --type migration --exec grep -l "ElementStackType\|LIVE_QUIZ\|typeNEW" {}
Length of output: 922
This has been added - in the script one needs to uncomment the line where the updates are executed / applied |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/graphql/src/scripts/2024-12-27_drop_live_session_cache_data.ts (1)
14-16: Use SCAN instead of KEYS for large Redis instances.
redisExec.keys('s:*')can cause performance bottlenecks or timeouts when there are many keys in Redis. Replacingkeyswith a cursor-based approach likeSCANis often recommended for production usage.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/graphql/src/scripts/2024-12-27_drop_live_session_cache_data.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/graphql/src/scripts/2024-12-27_drop_live_session_cache_data.ts (3)
5-11: Consider adding error handling for Redis connection.
If the connection fails or if there's a credentials issue, the script may throw an uncaught exception. Wrapping the Redis instantiation in a try/catch block or validating environment variables can help gracefully handle errors and possibly retry or exit the script with a meaningful error message.
18-19: Clarify the usage of the commented-out deletion line.
The script currently logs the keys to be deleted but does not actually remove them. It might be helpful to provide a command-line option or environment variable-based toggle for users to control whether the deletion should occur, ensuring that no accidental data removal happens.
21-24: Ensure the script exits after asynchronous operations complete.
The call to redisExec.quit() is correct, but consider wrapping your script in a top-level try/finally or similar approach to guarantee orderly shutdown if an error is thrown. Also verify that top-level await is supported in the runtime environment or ensure an IIFE (Immediately Invoked Function Expression) is used if needed.
|
This pull requests removes the live session table and all related information and completes the renaming of the newly introduced / extended status enums. This migrations should only be merged and applied after the changes related to the live quiz migration have been applied to the production database and the status migration script has been executed.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Refactor