Fix for VIVO-3986 #466
Merged
Fix for VIVO-3986 #466
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…oid removal not related permissions
chenejac
approved these changes
May 9, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
General comment
This is a tiny PR which is fixing a regression bug. I believe this might be merged without the second reviewer.
Testing
I have tested as it is described in the linked GitHub issue description. The PR is fixing the issue.
Code reviewing
No complaints for the code.
wwtamu
approved these changes
May 9, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
VIVO GitHub issue
What does this pull request do?
Provided named key components to reduceInactiveValueSets method to avoid removal not related permissions
How should this be tested?
A description of what steps someone could take to:
Interested parties
@VIVO-project/vivo-committers
Reviewers' expertise
Candidates for reviewing this PR should have some of the following expertises:
Reviewers' report template
General comment
A reviewer should provide here comments and suggestions for requested changes if any.
Testing
A reviewer should briefly describe here how it was tested
Code reviewing
A reviewer should briefly describe here which part was code reviewed