-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
[Core][V1] Support sharded state loading #19971
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @aarnphm, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request primarily focuses on enabling and enhancing the flexibility of sharded state loading within the v1 engine. By removing a previous restriction and introducing a configurable 'strict' mode for the model loader, it aims to facilitate faster and more robust model loading, particularly for checkpoint formats that might not perfectly align with the expected state dictionary.
Highlights
- Sharded State Loading Enabled for V1 Engine: I have removed the explicit check in
vllm/engine/arg_utils.py
that previously prevented the v1 engine from utilizing sharded state loading. This change enables the use of sharded state for faster model loading. - Flexible Checkpoint Loading with 'strict' Option: I introduced a new
strict
option to theShardedStateLoader
invllm/model_executor/model_loader/sharded_state_loader.py
. This option, configurable via--model-loader-extra-config
, allows the loader to proceed even if some keys are missing from the loaded state dictionary whenstrict
is set toFalse
. This addresses issues with certain checkpoint types, such as FP8, that might have discrepancies. - Improved Error Handling for Missing Keys: The
load_weights
method insharded_state_loader.py
now conditionally raises aValueError
for missing keys based on thestrict
flag. Ifstrict
isFalse
, missing keys are logged at debug level instead of immediately raising an error, providing more flexibility during model loading.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces sharded state loading for the v1 engine, enhancing loading performance. It also adds a strict
loading option to handle incomplete checkpoints during debugging. I suggest changing the logging level for missing keys from debug
to warning
when not in strict mode to improve user awareness of potential loading issues.
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project. 💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels. Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging. To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add 🚀 |
Signed-off-by: Aaron Pham <[email protected]>
b1c2263
to
276d2e6
Compare
This PR removes the oracles check for sharded state for v1.
However, it seems like the save sharded weights doesn't work with fp8 checkpoint (I tested with qwen3-235b-a22b) but after removing some of the exception with debug, the models weights seems to be loaded correctly.
So I added a
strict
options to--model-loader-extra-config
to lax these checks for fp8 checkpoint.I think this would be a good starting point before adding specific code path for loading quantized weights.
I'm currently in the progress of debugging this, but this should halves the loading time comparing with the default safetensors implementations.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Pham [email protected]