-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
[Models] Remove GPU-CPU sync when do_pan_and_scan=false
in Gemma3
#19999
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Lukas Geiger <[email protected]>
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project. 💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels. Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging. To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add 🚀 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @lgeiger, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request introduces an optimization for the Gemma3 multimodal model within vLLM by removing an unnecessary GPU-CPU synchronization. It specifically targets the image processing pipeline when the do_pan_and_scan
feature is not in use, streamlining the flow by making num_patches
optional and avoiding redundant tensor operations and data splitting, which improves performance by allowing more CPU operations to overlap with GPU work.
Highlights
- Performance Optimization: Eliminated an unnecessary GPU-CPU synchronization point in the Gemma3 model's image processing pipeline. This occurs when
do_pan_and_scan
isfalse
, by preventing thenum_patches
tensor from being converted to a list (tolist()
) and avoiding the splitting ofimage_embeds
. - Optional
num_patches
Field: Thenum_patches
field in theGemma3ImagePixelInputs
TypedDict has been made optional usingtyping_extensions.NotRequired
, reflecting its conditional usage when pan-and-scan is not active. - Streamlined Image Preprocessing: Adjusted
_call_hf_processor
,_get_mm_fields_config
,_parse_and_validate_image_input
, and_process_image_input
to conditionally bypassnum_crops
andimage_embeds
splitting logic whendo_pan_and_scan
is disabled, reducing redundant computations and data transfers.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request removes GPU-CPU synchronization when do_pan_and_scan=false
in Gemma3 by making the num_patches
tensor optional and preventing the splitting of image_embeds
. The changes look good, but I've suggested adding a few comments to improve code clarity and robustness.
When
do_pan_and_scan=false
we currently still doing a bit of extra preprocessing work, pass around anum_crops
tensor and callnum_patches.tolist()
. This is not necessary and the latter causes GPU host synchronization, preventing some more CPU operations to be overlapped with GPU work:This PR makes
num_patches
tensor optional and prevents splittingimage_embeds
wich removes a synchronization point.At the moment this is only a very tiny performance improvement since
{scatter, gather}_mm_placeholders
also cause synchronization shortly after.This could be prevented as well with the following patch:
But I think this patch is a bit cumbersome so it's probably easier to wait for pytorch/pytorch#156384 which makes GPU tensor indexing with a boolean CPU mask non-blocking.