Editoral: Link to registry inclusion criteria definitions

[mohamedamir]

Before this PR, the definitions were created but never linked it, which causes ReSpec warnings,

---

Preview | Diff

[timcappalli]

I don't think this is necessary as term definitions don't typically link to where they're used. It should be the opposite (the table headings link down to the definitions).

[mohamedamir]

I don't think this is necessary as term definitions don't typically link to where they're used. It should be the opposite (the table headings link down to the definitions).

@timcappalli
Yes, this was my understanding as well, but I got confused by the current state.
So should I do the opposite or remove the definition tags altogether?
As of today, they are throwing ReSpec warnings and I believe we should get this fixed before publishing the FWPD.

WDYT?

[timcappalli]

@mohamedamir reversed them in 92da697

[mohamedamir]

Thanks @timcappalli
This indeed makes more sense!

[TallTed]

Trivial, for consistency & clarity.