Skip to content

Give the Advisory Board a mission statement #1021

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fantasai
Copy link
Collaborator

Tries to tie together the various roles under a mission statement
and organizes the roles as bullet points, similar to the TAG.

Based on discussions captured in
  w3c/AB-memberonly#248
  https://www.w3.org/2025/03/26-ABpurpose-minutes.html
  https://www.w3.org/2025/Talks/AC/ab-wendy-reid/slides.pdf
As part of a [=W3C Council=],
members of the [=Advisory Board=] hear and adjudicate on [=Submission Appeals=]
and [=Formal Objections=].
<li>Managing the <a href="#GAProcess">evolution of the Process Document</a>.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought the role was stronger than this with respect to the process?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
<li>Managing the <a href="#GAProcess">evolution of the Process Document</a>.
<li>Managing the <a href="#GAProcess">evolution of the Process Document</a>.</li>

Note: While the [=AB=] as such does not have decision-making authority,
its members do when sitting as part of a [=W3C Council=].
However, as part of a [=W3C Council=],
members of the [=Advisory Board=] hear and adjudicate on [=Submission Appeals=]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
members of the [=Advisory Board=] hear and adjudicate on [=Submission Appeals=]
members of the [=Advisory Board=] hear and adjudicate [=Submission Appeals=]

on issues of strategy,
management,
legal matters,
process,
community engagement,
and conflict resolution.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
and conflict resolution.
and conflict resolution.</li>

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's unnecessary. <li> is a self-closing tag.

and conflict resolution.
The Advisory Board also serves the Members
<li>Serving the Members
by tracking issues raised between Advisory Committee meetings,
soliciting Member comments on such issues,
and proposing actions to resolve these issues.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
and proposing actions to resolve these issues.
and proposing actions to resolve these issues.</li>

Copy link
Collaborator

@frivoal frivoal Apr 16, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's unnecessary. <li> is a self-closing tag.

@TallTed
Copy link
Member

TallTed commented Apr 15, 2025

Those </li> may be optional. I do not feel that such optionality means they should always be left out. To my eye, they help keep the source coherently readable, which is important since that is where the document is edited. (So far as I'm aware, there's no user-focused editing tool for .bs documents that shows the rendered result along the way.)


The [=Advisory Board=] is distinct from the [=Board of Directors=]
and has no decision-making authority within W3C;
and has no decision-making authority over W3C;
its role is strictly advisory.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
its role is strictly advisory.

Given the AB's role in managing the Process document (and now also The Vision, and facilitating the Code of Conduct, which can be a separate PR), and FO Councils, it's high time to remove this legacy phrase which causes more confusion than clarity in practice.


The [=Advisory Board=] is distinct from the [=Board of Directors=]
and has no decision-making authority within W3C;
and has no decision-making authority over W3C;
Copy link
Member

@tantek tantek Apr 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
and has no decision-making authority over W3C;
and has no decision-making authority over W3C.

Punctuation consistent with the prior suggestion.

Copy link
Member

@tantek tantek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Made a couple of optional suggestions which I think improve this section along with these edits, however will defer to editor's discretion.

Rest of it is a solid incremental improvement.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants