Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refinements of RLN on mainnet spec #34
Refinements of RLN on mainnet spec #34
Changes from 13 commits
f15b30a
586d70b
818ce98
82b4bc7
8d7a41b
2a1b433
dfe5e53
5ef1d30
258a07e
0f9d680
fd91933
3a1aabb
ca0c416
eb4dfd6
cc1a917
090c65c
7c29616
66945c7
b8ea666
80ba2bd
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sembr please.
I would not bother implementing that @richard-ramos
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is unneeded complexity in the smart contract. I did push in favour of lazy override initially. But I was convinced otherwise by higher gas cost and fluctuation of price.
IMO it would make more sense for the app to select the membership to override.
Meaning the contract would just revert if the total rate limit is exceed and no memberships are being overridden (no gas lost, right @richard-ramos ?)
It's then up to the application to be clever on how to select memberships to override.