Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create engine that works with GlideV4 RC #114

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ParkerK
Copy link

@ParkerK ParkerK commented Jul 1, 2017

Glide 4 will change handling of methods and put them inside a RequestOptions object: https://bumptech.github.io/glide/doc/migrating.html

I took the GlideEngine.java file and applied the changes needed to make it work with Glide V4

Glide 4 will change handling of methods and put them inside a RequestOptions object: https://bumptech.github.io/glide/doc/migrating.html
* {@link ImageEngine} implementation using Glide.
*/

public class GlideEngine implements ImageEngine {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The file name is GlideV4Engine, but the class name is GlideEngine

@gejiaheng
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not digging into this issue. But something you should pay attention to is how you make Glide v3.x and v4.x coexist? They have the same dependency group name and artifact name.

@gejiaheng gejiaheng mentioned this pull request Sep 21, 2017
@tomoima525
Copy link

@gejiaheng Hey any progress for this?
I would suggest creating another branch that supports Glide V4 and then create another version of the library. And make V3 obsolete in the end.

@REBOOTERS
Copy link
Contributor

Since ImageEngine is a Interface .Anyone who use Glide V4 can realize a GlideEngine for V4 by himself .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants