Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: Remove deprecated function that registers an operator of avsRegistry writer #460

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

maximopalopoli
Copy link
Contributor

What Changed?

The function RegisterOperatorInQuorumWithAVSRegistryCoordinator from avsRegistry's chainWriter can be removed since it has been deprecated on this PR (7 months ago), previous than 0.1.13 released version (2 months ago).

Reviewer Checklist

  • Code is well-documented
  • Code adheres to Go naming conventions
  • Code deprecates any old functionality before removing it

@maximopalopoli maximopalopoli changed the title refactor: Remove deprecated function that registers an operator erefactor: Remove deprecated function that registers an operator of avsRegistry writer Jan 22, 2025
@maximopalopoli maximopalopoli changed the title erefactor: Remove deprecated function that registers an operator of avsRegistry writer refactor: Remove deprecated function that registers an operator of avsRegistry writer Jan 22, 2025
// RegisterOperator is similar to RegisterOperatorInQuorumWithAVSRegistryCoordinator but
// generates a random salt and expiry for the signature.
// RegisterOperator is used to register a single operator with the AVS's registry coordinator. Is similar to
// previous RegisterOperatorInQuorumWithAVSRegistryCoordinator but generates a random salt and expiry for the signature.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if the function was removed, it is not necessary to mention its name here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed that part of the comment in 73a98f5

@maximopalopoli maximopalopoli marked this pull request as ready for review January 22, 2025 21:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants