-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 278
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Automatically detect character encoding of YAML files and ignore files #630
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
8cedbee
to
3fa4c57
Compare
3fa4c57
to
75b2889
Compare
75b2889
to
be0cc85
Compare
fd2c72d
to
bb8dc2b
Compare
I just noticed that one of the checks for this PR is failing. The coverage for |
At the moment, no. I'm sorry, please excuse the delay, this is a big change with much impact, I need a large time slot to review this, which I couldn't find yet. |
bb8dc2b
to
13be50b
Compare
13be50b
to
d569de6
Compare
d569de6
to
d562b6b
Compare
d562b6b
to
aeabade
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello Jason, please excuse the very long delay for reviewing this... This was a big piece and I needed time. I apologize.
The 6 commits are well splitted, well explained, and make the review much easier. Thanks a lot!
In my opinion this PR is good to go. I suspect it can solve problems in several cases (including the issues you pointed out), but I also see a small risk of breakage on exotic systems the day it's released. If this happens, will you be around to help find a solution?
A few notes:
- I notice that you used encoding names with underscores (e.g.
utf_8
vs.utf-8
). I just read on https://docs.python.org/fr/3/library/codecs.html#standard-encodings that not only are they valid, but they also seem to be the "right" notation:Notice that spelling alternatives that only differ in case or use a hyphen instead of an underscore are also valid aliases; therefore, e.g. 'utf-8' is a valid alias for the 'utf_8' codec.
- I feared that using
open().decode()
would put the whole contents of files in memory before even linting them, and affect performance. But this is already what yamllint does currently.
Before this change, build_temp_workspace() would always encode a path using UTF-8 and the strict error handler [1]. Most of the time, this is fine, but systems do not necessarily use UTF-8 and the strict error handler for paths [2]. [1]: <https://docs.python.org/3.12/library/stdtypes.html#str.encode> [2]: <https://docs.python.org/3.12/glossary.html#term-filesystem-encoding-and-error-handler>
Before this commit, test_run_default_format_output_in_tty() changed the values of sys.stdout and sys.stderr, but it would never change them back. This commit makes sure that they get changed back. At the moment, this commit doesn’t make a user-visible difference. A future commit will add a new test named test_ignored_from_file_with_multiple_encodings(). That new test requires stdout and stderr to be restored, or else it will fail.
Before this change, yamllint would open YAML files using open()’s default encoding. As long as UTF-8 mode isn’t enabled, open() defaults to using the system’s locale encoding [1][2]. This can cause problems in multiple different scenarios. The first scenario involves linting UTF-8 YAML files on Linux systems. Most of the time, the locale encoding on Linux systems is set to UTF-8 [3][4], but it can be set to something else [5]. In the unlikely event that someone was using Linux with a locale encoding other than UTF-8, there was a chance that yamllint would crash with a UnicodeDecodeError. The second scenario involves linting UTF-8 YAML files on Windows systems. The locale encoding on Windows systems is the system’s ANSI code page [6]. The ANSI code page on Windows systems is NOT set to UTF-8 by default [7]. In the very likely event that someone was using Windows with a locale encoding other than UTF-8, there was a chance that yamllint would crash with a UnicodeDecodeError. Additionally, using open()’s default encoding is a violation of the YAML spec. Chapter 5.2 says: “On input, a YAML processor must support the UTF-8 and UTF-16 character encodings. For JSON compatibility, the UTF-32 encodings must also be supported. If a character stream begins with a byte order mark, the character encoding will be taken to be as indicated by the byte order mark. Otherwise, the stream must begin with an ASCII character. This allows the encoding to be deduced by the pattern of null (x00) characters.” [8] This change fixes all of those problems by implementing the YAML spec’s character encoding detection algorithm. Now, as long as YAML files begin with either a byte order mark or an ASCII character, yamllint will automatically detect them as being UTF-8, UTF-16 or UTF-32. Other character encodings are not supported at the moment. Credit for the idea of having tests with pre-encoded strings goes to @adrienverge [9]. Fixes adrienverge#218. Fixes adrienverge#238. Fixes adrienverge#347. [1]: <https://docs.python.org/3.12/library/functions.html#open> [2]: <https://docs.python.org/3.12/library/os.html#utf8-mode> [3]: <https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Extended-Char-Intro.html> [4]: <https://wiki.musl-libc.org/functional-differences-from-glibc.html#Character-sets-and-locale> [5]: <https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=localedata/SUPPORTED;h=c8b63cc2fe2b4547f2fb1bff6193da68d70bd563;hb=36f2487f13e3540be9ee0fb51876b1da72176d3f> [6]: <https://docs.python.org/3.12/glossary.html#term-locale-encoding> [7]: <https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/design/globalizing/use-utf8-code-page> [8]: <https://yaml.org/spec/1.2.2/#52-character-encodings> [9]: <adrienverge#630 (comment)>
Before this change, yamllint would decode files on the ignore-from-file list using open()’s default encoding [1][2]. This can cause decoding to fail in some situations (see the previous commit message for details). This change makes yamllint automatically detect the encoding for files on the ignore-from-file list. It uses the same algorithm that it uses for detecting the encoding of YAML files, so the same limitations apply: files must use UTF-8, UTF-16 or UTF-32 and they must begin with either a byte order mark or an ASCII character. [1]: <https://docs.python.org/3.12/library/fileinput.html#fileinput.input> [2]: <https://docs.python.org/3.12/library/fileinput.html#fileinput.FileInput>
In general, using open()’s default encoding is a mistake [1]. This change makes sure that every time open() is called, the encoding parameter is specified. Specifically, it makes it so that all tests succeed when run like this: python -X warn_default_encoding -W error::EncodingWarning -m unittest discover [1]: <https://peps.python.org/pep-0597/#using-the-default-encoding-is-a-common-mistake>
The previous few commits have removed all calls to open() that use its default encoding. That being said, it’s still possible that code added in the future will contain that same mistake. This commit makes it so that the CI test job will fail if that mistake is made again. Unfortunately, it doesn’t look like coverage.py allows you to specify -X options [1] or warning filters [2] when running your tests [3]. To work around this problem, I’m running all of the Python code, including coverage.py itself, with -X warn_default_encoding and -W error::EncodingWarning. As a result, the CI test job will also fail if coverage.py uses open()’s default encoding. Hopefully, coverage.py won’t do that. If it does, then we can always temporarily revert this commit. [1]: <https://docs.python.org/3.12/using/cmdline.html#cmdoption-X> [2]: <https://docs.python.org/3.12/using/cmdline.html#cmdoption-W> [3]: <https://coverage.readthedocs.io/en/7.4.0/cmd.html#execution-coverage-run>
aeabade
to
a6031a4
Compare
You shouldn’t be apologizing, I should be thanking you. Thank you for taking the time to review this PR and to write valuable review comments. Sometimes, maintainers don’t take the time to thoroughly review my contributions. When that happens, my contributions end up being rejected without being understood which is frustrating and saddening. You’re review comments are different, though. They clearly demonstrate that you took the time to read, understand and think about this PR. I’d much rather receive a thoughtful review than a timely one.
Sure! I had thought about adding a Now that you mention the small risk of breakage on exotic systems, it’s making me think about the I just pushed a new version of this pull request with the following changes:
|
This PR makes sure that yamllint never uses
open()
’s default encoding. Specifically, it uses the character encoding detection algorithm specified in chapter 5.2 of the YAML spec when reading both YAML files and files that are on theignore-from-file
list.There are two other PRs that are similar to this one. Here’s how this PR compares to those two:
ignore-from-file
list. Those two PRs only detects the encoding of files being linted.chardet
. This PR doesn’t add any dependencies.yamllint
package is simpler.test
package is much more complicated, but hopefully it tests things more thoroughly.Fixes #218. Fixes #238. Fixes #347.
Closes #240. Closes #581.