Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Cache Resolver] Implement relative web path resolver #1059

Closed
wants to merge 16 commits into from
Closed

[Cache Resolver] Implement relative web path resolver #1059

wants to merge 16 commits into from

Conversation

nmuntyanov
Copy link

@nmuntyanov nmuntyanov commented Feb 20, 2018 •
edited
Loading

#| Q | A
| --- | ---
| Branch? | 2.0
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | no
| BC breaks? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass? | yes
| Fixed tickets | #1050
| License | MIT

Added new path resolver for relative paths creation
(RelativeWebPathResolver && RelativeWebPathResolverFactory)

usage example:

liip_imagine:
  resolvers:
     default:
       relative_web_path:
         web_root:  "%kernel.root_dir%/../web"
         cache_prefix: assets

@makasim
Copy link
Collaborator

makasim commented Feb 20, 2018

It would better to register a new resolver for that, instead of adding a bool flag.

@nmuntyanov nmuntyanov changed the title 2.0 RelativeWebPathResolverAdded Feb 20, 2018
@robfrawley robfrawley changed the title RelativeWebPathResolverAdded [Cache Resolver] Implement relative web path resolver Feb 21, 2018
@robfrawley robfrawley added Level: New Feature 🆕 This item involves the introduction of new functionality. Type: Documentation This item pertains to documentation of this project. State: Reviewing This item is being reviewed to determine if it should be accepted. Type: Source Code This item pertains to the source code of this project. labels Feb 21, 2018
@robfrawley robfrawley added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Feb 21, 2018
@robfrawley
Copy link
Collaborator

robfrawley commented Feb 21, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Once we work out all the code implementation details (which I'll provide my comments on shortly, once I get a chance to review everything), be advised that we only accept PRs that includes documentation.

You should add the appropriate files in the Resources/doc directory and you can build the RST files to HTML by following the Wiki article for local testing. The documentation is important and is auto-generated from the RST files for https://symfony.com/doc/master/bundles/LiipImagineBundle/index.html.

@maximgubar
Copy link
Contributor

@nmuntyanov please resolve conflicts on this PR, so it could be processed further.

nmuntyanov added 2 commits May 1, 2018 12:43
@nmuntyanov
Merge branch '2.0' of https://github.com/liip/LiipImagineBundle into 2.0
18b92df 
# Conflicts:
#	Tests/DependencyInjection/ConfigurationTest.php
#	Tests/DependencyInjection/Factory/Resolver/WebPathResolverFactoryTest.php
#	Tests/DependencyInjection/LiipImagineExtensionTest.php
#	Tests/Imagine/Cache/Resolver/WebPathResolverTest.php
@nmuntyanov
Class wording refactored
f8417c0
@nmuntyanov
Copy link
Author

Resolved

@nmuntyanov
Copy link
Author

Tests were fixed here: #1087

@nmuntyanov
Copy link
Author

@robfrawley check this PR please.

@maximgubar
Copy link
Contributor

since default branch was changed to master, please update the base branch for this PR

@nmuntyanov nmuntyanov changed the base branch from 2.0 to master June 26, 2018 15:39
@nmuntyanov
Copy link
Author

@maximgubar updated

This was referenced Nov 4, 2018
Closed
Closed
@daFish daFish mentioned this pull request Nov 26, 2018
Closed
@icedevelopment
Copy link

Any news regarding this PR? @maximgubar @nmuntyanov
Would be really nice to have this feature.

@s-titov
Copy link

s-titov commented Sep 17, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Any news? @nmuntyanov

@franmomu franmomu mentioned this pull request Oct 5, 2019
Open
@michellesanver michellesanver removed this from the 2.0.0 milestone Nov 29, 2019
@michellesanver
Copy link
Contributor

Replaced by #1233

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Level: New Feature 🆕 This item involves the introduction of new functionality. State: Reviewing This item is being reviewed to determine if it should be accepted. Type: Documentation This item pertains to documentation of this project. Type: Source Code This item pertains to the source code of this project.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
7 participants
@nmuntyanov @makasim @robfrawley @maximgubar @icedevelopment @s-titov @michellesanver