-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
8351319: AOT cache support for custom class loaders broken since JDK-8348426 #23926
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8351319: AOT cache support for custom class loaders broken since JDK-8348426 #23926
Conversation
👋 Welcome back iklam! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@iklam This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
…-since-jdk-8348426
…-since-jdk-8348426
@iklam This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good.
I suppose there already tests for the other end of the process, where an unregistered class in the AOT cache is actually used. What are those tests?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes look good!
…d from cache; (2) cp->resolved_reference_length() was not set correctly
It turns out that the existing tests only check for unregistered classes in the classical CDS archive. I added a test in BulkLoaderTest.java to check the AOT cache and found a bug. Fixed in c02a611 |
…-since-jdk-8348426
…-since-jdk-8348426
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updates look good.
Thanks @calvinccheung @matias9927 @rose00 for the review |
Going to push as commit e3f26b0.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Since JDK-8348426 (Generate binary file for -XX:AOTMode=record -XX:AOTConfiguration=file), the AOT cache no longer contains classes intended for custom class loaders (these are called "unregistered classes" in CDS terminology).
The fix is simple -- we already remember the set of unregistered classes in the AOT configuration file. We just need to add them into the final AOT cache (see changes in finalImageRecipes.cpp).
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23926/head:pull/23926
$ git checkout pull/23926
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23926
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23926/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23926
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23926
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23926.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment