Skip to content

Issues: spdx/tools-python

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

63 Open 294 Closed
63 Open 294 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Publish spdx-tools under a SPDX organisation on PyPI
#837 opened Nov 28, 2024 by bact
Writer for spdx 2.2
#835 opened Nov 18, 2024 by AdrianCert
1
URLs with capital letters fail on the URL check
#832 opened Oct 29, 2024 by CsatariGergely
1
Very badly formed SPDX generates exceptions other than SPDXParsingError
#831 opened Oct 10, 2024 by king-doug-conti
PrimaryPackagePurpose field output OPERATING_SYSTEM instead of official value OPERATING-SYSTEM
#827 opened Oct 1, 2024 by loulou123546
Validation for download_location does not respect URI with case insensitivity hostname and protocol
#825 opened Sep 30, 2024 by clabbenius
Type errors are hard to read due to unrendered color codes
#822 opened Sep 18, 2024 by stefan6419846
SPDX License List Version now has Patch version too
#820 opened Aug 22, 2024 by AyanSinhaMahapatra
Validation performance extremely poor
#818 opened Aug 5, 2024 by billie-alsup
5
ExternalPackageRefCategory problems
#813 opened Jul 17, 2024 by billie-alsup
2
"primaryPackagePurpose": "application" should be flagged as invalid validation An issue concerning the validation of SPDX documents
#812 opened Jul 10, 2024 by vargenau
OPENSSL and zlib not recognized as valid licences validation An issue concerning the validation of SPDX documents
#811 opened Jul 9, 2024 by vargenau
2
LicenseRef-Case-Sensitive and LicenseRef-case-sensitive not recognized as the same identifier validation An issue concerning the validation of SPDX documents
#810 opened Jul 9, 2024 by vargenau
duplicate licenseId not detected validation An issue concerning the validation of SPDX documents
#809 opened Jul 9, 2024 by vargenau
SPDX-tools
#808 opened Jul 4, 2024 by virajgaonkar
1
The LicenseRef prefix should not be required for standard licenses
#804 opened Apr 24, 2024 by Zhuochengyu
1
Why use uritools instead of the standard library urllib?
#803 opened Mar 22, 2024 by pombredanne
1
Remove unused semantic_version module
#802 opened Mar 22, 2024 by pombredanne
1
Error while calling SPDX parse_file() API inside thread function
#801 opened Mar 21, 2024 by Noufalp90
Incorrect cpe23Type validation? bug
#796 opened Feb 5, 2024 by anthonyharrison
3
create_list_without_duplicates Function Can be Sped Up By Using Set
#794 opened Feb 4, 2024 by jspeed-meyers
1
Would like an option to omit files from graph
#793 opened Feb 1, 2024 by Malcolmnixon
Slow for SBOMs with a large number of files + relationships
#790 opened Jan 25, 2024 by jonjohnsonjr
1
1
would like to package - but the name is unsuitable
#789 opened Jan 23, 2024 by paulwouters
1
Converting valid JSON SPDX file to tag:value gives invalid SPDX bug
#788 opened Jan 17, 2024 by vargenau
1
ProTip! Mix and match filters to narrow down what you’re looking for.