-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 333
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[-Wunsafe-buffer-usage] Accept calls to some libc functions with annotated arguments #10088
base: next
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[-Wunsafe-buffer-usage] Accept calls to some libc functions with annotated arguments #10088
Conversation
…tated arguments - `printf`, `fprintf` `snprintf` functions accept `__null_terminated` - `snprintf` function accepts `__counted_by/__sized_by` - functions consuming a single string pointer like `strlen` or `atoi` accept `__null_terminated` Generalized `isCountAttributedPointerArgumentSafe` so that it is shared by interoperation gadgets and the unsafe libc gadget. (A follow-up change to rdar://138798346)
CC @dtarditi |
This PR depends on #10060 |
@@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ const Expr *extractExtentFromSubviewDataCall(ASTContext &Context, | |||
static bool hasIntegeralConstant(const Expr *E, uint64_t Val, ASTContext &Ctx) { | |||
Expr::EvalResult ER; | |||
|
|||
if (E->EvaluateAsConstantExpr(ER, Ctx)) { | |||
if (E->EvaluateAsInt(ER, Ctx)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
According to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124022/files, the result of EvaluateAsConstantExpr
may not necessarily be able to getInt()
later.
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ namespace std { | |||
T* p; | |||
T *c_str(); | |||
T *data(); | |||
unsigned size_bytes(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A mistake I made in the test---std::string has no size_bytes
method.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's probably worth checking if basic_string<wchar_t>
works as expected.
@@ -366,6 +366,7 @@ isInUnspecifiedUntypedContext(internal::Matcher<Stmt> InnerMatcher) { | |||
|
|||
namespace { | |||
|
|||
/* TO_UPSTREAM(BoundsSafetyInterop) ON */ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I assume there is no problem in upstreaming the part of the interop in UnsafeBufferUsage.cpp? @patrykstefanski
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yup, this is fine.
add @jkorous-apple |
snwprintf(safe_p, n, "%s", str); // expected-warning{{function 'snwprintf' is unsafe}} expected-note{{string argument is not guaranteed to be null-terminated}} | ||
|
||
memcpy(safe_p, safe_p, n); // no warn | ||
strlen(str); // expected-warning{{unsafe assignment to a parameter of '__null_terminated' type; only '__null_terminated' pointers, string literals, and 'std::string::c_str' calls are compatible with '__null_terminated' pointers}} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not getting this warning here.
error: 'expected-warning' diagnostics expected but not seen:
File ./clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-unsafe-buffer-usage-libc-functions-interop.cpp Line 36: unsafe assignment to a parameter of '__null_terminated' type; only '__null_terminated' pointers, string literals, and 'std::string::c_str' calls are compatible with '__null_terminated' pointers
&*ValuesOpt, Context); | ||
return isCountAttributedPointerArgumentSafeImpl( | ||
Context, Arg, CountArg, CAT, CAT->getCountExpr(), CAT->isCountInBytes(), | ||
CAT->isOrNull(), ValuesOpt ? &*ValuesOpt : nullptr); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: IMHO we could be explicit to avoid any confusion: ValuesOpt.has_value() ? &*ValuesOpt : nullptr
.
assert(CountedByExpr || | ||
!DependentValueMap && | ||
"If the __counted_by information is hardcoded, there is no " | ||
"dependent value map."); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the operator precedence in those 2 asserts correct? The bottom one is equivalent to:
CountedByExpr ||
(!DependentValueMap &&
"If the __counted_by information is hardcoded, there is no "
"dependent value map.")
Is this expected?
auto ValuesOpt = getDependentValuesFromCall(CAT, Call); | ||
if (!ValuesOpt.has_value()) | ||
if (!DependentValueMap && CountedByExpr) | ||
// Bail if the map is not available for case (a). Becuase |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Becuase
-> Because
.
return false; | ||
|
||
const Expr *ArgCount = nullptr; | ||
// the acutal count of the pointer inferred through patterns below: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
acutal
-> actual
|
||
// expected-note@+2{{consider using a safe container and passing '.data()' to the parameter 'dst' and '.size()' to its dependent parameter 'size' or 'std::span' and passing '.first(...).data()' to the parameter 'dst'}} | ||
// expected-note@+1{{consider using a safe container and passing '.data()' to the parameter 'src' and '.size()' to its dependent parameter 'size' or 'std::span' and passing '.first(...).data()' to the parameter 'src'}} | ||
void memcpy(void * __sized_by(size) dst, const void * __sized_by(size) src, unsigned size); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
memcpy
returns void *
and takes size_t size
.
void memcpy(void * __sized_by(size) dst, const void * __sized_by(size) src, unsigned size); | ||
unsigned strlen( const char* __null_terminated str ); | ||
// expected-note@+1{{consider using a safe container and passing '.data()' to the parameter 'buffer' and '.size()' to its dependent parameter 'buf_size' or 'std::span' and passing '.first(...).data()' to the parameter 'buffer'}} | ||
int snprintf( char* __counted_by(buf_size) buffer, unsigned buf_size, const char* format, ... ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: Those printf
functions take size_t
.
// expected-note@+1{{consider using a safe container and passing '.data()' to the parameter 'buffer' and '.size()' to its dependent parameter 'buf_size' or 'std::span' and passing '.first(...).data()' to the parameter 'buffer'}} | ||
int snprintf( char* __counted_by(buf_size) buffer, unsigned buf_size, const char* format, ... ); | ||
int snwprintf( char* __counted_by(buf_size) buffer, unsigned buf_size, const char* format, ... ); | ||
int vsnprintf( char* __counted_by(buf_size) buffer, unsigned buf_size, const char* format, ... ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should take va_list vlist
instead of ...
.
} | ||
return true; // ptr and size are not in safe pattern | ||
return !isHardcodedCountedByPointerArgumentSafe( | ||
Finder->getASTContext(), Buf, Size, FirstParmTy.getTypePtr(), true, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is true
passed to isSizedBy
correct here? I think the functions taking wchar_t
would be annotated with __counted_by()
.
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ namespace std { | |||
T* p; | |||
T *c_str(); | |||
T *data(); | |||
unsigned size_bytes(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's probably worth checking if basic_string<wchar_t>
works as expected.
printf
,fprintf
snprintf
functions accept__null_terminated
snprintf
function accepts__counted_by/__sized_by
strlen
oratoi
accept__null_terminated
Generalized
isCountAttributedPointerArgumentSafe
so that it is shared by interoperation gadgets and the unsafe libc gadget.(A follow-up change to rdar://138798346)