[HW Interface] Use new handle API inside the hardware components

[saikishor]

Use new handle API inside the hardware components to be sure that you always set and retrieve value

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 84.31373% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.53%. Comparing base (3aa38b0) to head (fcda603).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
.../include/hardware_interface/actuator_interface.hpp	80.95%	2 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...ce/include/hardware_interface/system_interface.hpp	80.95%	2 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2092      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.54%   89.53%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         139      139              
  Lines       15125    15160      +35     
  Branches     1283     1287       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits        13543    13574      +31     
+ Misses       1096     1095       -1     
- Partials      486      491       +5     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	89.53% <84.31%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...re_interface/include/hardware_interface/handle.hpp	86.25% <100.00%> (+2.25%)	⬆️
...ce/include/hardware_interface/sensor_interface.hpp	96.29% <100.00%> (+0.09%)	⬆️
.../include/hardware_interface/actuator_interface.hpp	93.50% <80.95%> (-2.21%)	⬇️
...ce/include/hardware_interface/system_interface.hpp	85.63% <80.95%> (-1.25%)	⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

[christophfroehlich]

LGTM. The CM catches the exceptions, right?

[saikishor]

LGTM. The CM catches the exceptions, right?

Yes! 😃