Store allow_backfills in the sensor metadata

[OwenKephart]

Summary & Motivation

This allows it to be transferred across the serdes boundary, enabling it for non-user code automation conditions

How I Tested These Changes

Changelog

NOCHANGELOG

[OwenKephart]

• [1.9] Replace Auto-materialize references in the UI with Automation condition #25414
• [1.9] Update evaluation id logic to be in sync with tick ids #25269
• [1.9] Add automation_condition to observable_source_asset #25344
• [1.9] Create default_automation_condition_sensor in Definitions object #25201
• [1.9] Update deprecation warnings for automation_condition, auto_materialize_policy, and freshness_policy #25208
• [1.9] Remove experimental warnings from AutomationCondition static constructors #25207
• [1.9] Promote hidden params to top-level args in AutomationConditionSensorDefinition #25206
• [1.9] Update default value of allow_backfills to True #25204
• Add executed_with_root_target condition to handle partial runs / failures #25253
• Add error for user code sensors with too many entities targeted #25215
• Add test demonstrating that we do not hit the RESOURCE_EXHAUSTED error above a given threshold #25214
• Propagate automation condition information through the UI for user code conditions #25211
• Export AutomationContext and AutomationResult #25210
• Store allow_backfills in the sensor metadata #25203 👈
• Create backfill_in_progress AutomationCondition #25190
• [refactor] Move all operands into a single file #25187
• Remove description property, make names more descriptive #25186
• Simplify return types of static constructors for AutomationCondition #25184
• Add all_deps_blocking_checks_passed condition #25171
• Make existing conditions work with Asset Checks #25170
• master

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @OwenKephart and the rest of your teammates on Graphite

[schrockn]

naming question

Went with emit_backfills, which I agree is better. Did a little chatGPT searching for a better name and was not successful. Ideally, this will be a pretty niche option for people to turn off.

[OwenKephart]

Merge activity

• Oct 15, 3:52 PM EDT: A user started a stack merge that includes this pull request via Graphite.
• Oct 15, 4:07 PM EDT: Graphite rebased this pull request as part of a merge.
• Oct 15, 4:08 PM EDT: A user merged this pull request with Graphite.